期刊文献+

胸腰段脊柱骨折采取椎旁肌间隙入路椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗的临床效果

Clinical effect of thoracolumbar spine fracture treated with paraspinal muscle gap approach pedicle screw internal fixation
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨椎旁肌间隙入路椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的临床疗效。方法选择本院收治的胸腰段脊柱骨折106例,以随机信封法分为常规组与治疗组,各53例,常规组采取传统入路椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗,治疗组采取椎旁肌间隙入路椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后下床活动时间等。结果治疗组手术时间、术中出血量、术后下床活动时间均优于常规组(P<0.05);术后6个月,两组NRS评分、伤椎Cobb's角均明显降低,伤椎前缘高度比明显升高(P<0.05);术后6个月,治疗组NRS评分、伤椎Cobb's角均低于常规组(P<0.05)。结论椎旁肌间隙入路椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的效果显著,值得临床应用。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of paraspinal muscle gap approach pedicle screw internal fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar spine fracture. Methods According to the random envelope method, 106 cases of thoracolumbar spine fractures treated in our hospital were divided into conventional group and treatment group, with 53 cases in each group. The conventional group was treated with conventional pedicle screw internal fixation. The treatment group was treated with paraspinal muscle gap approach pedicle screw internal fixation. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative activity out of bed time of both groups were compared. Results The operation time intraoperative blood loss, postoperative activity out of bed time in the treatment group were better than those in the conventional group(P〈0.05). At 6 months after surgery, the NRS score and Cobb's angle significantly reduced, and the height ratio of front vertebral obviously increased in both groups(P〈0.05); the NRS score and Cobb's angle in the treatment group were lower than those in the conventional group(P〈0.05). Conclusion The treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures with paraspinal muscle gap approach pedicle screw internal fixation has significant effect, which is worthy of clinical application.
作者 贾文鹏 JIA Wen-peng(the Hospital of Fuping County, Weinan 711700, China)
机构地区 富平县医院
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2018年第14期54-55,共2页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 胸腰段脊柱骨折 椎旁肌间隙入路椎弓根螺钉内固定 传统入路椎弓根螺钉内固定 thoracolumbar spine fracture paraspinal muscle gap approach pedicle screw internal fixation conventional pedicle screw internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献94

  • 1张毅,钟德君.肌间隙入路结合伤椎置钉治疗胸腰段骨折34例分析[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(33):366-366. 被引量:1
  • 2李文生,陈永峰.椎旁肌间隙入路在治疗胸腰段骨折中的应用[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(17):140-140. 被引量:2
  • 3彭茂秀,汤呈宣,林利兴,戴鸣海,唐小君,何少奇,杨国敬.经椎旁肌间隙入路与传统开放式入路手术治疗胸腰段椎体骨折的临床比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2013,28(S1):1-2. 被引量:6
  • 4Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H .Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymaticanalysis. Spine. 1996;21 (8):941-944.
  • 5Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspina sacrospinalis- splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1968;50: 919-926.
  • 6吐尔洪江·吐尔迪,伍政疆.经肌间隙入路与正中常规切口入路植椎弓根钉治疗胸腰段骨折比较研究[J].中国保健营养(中旬刊),2013,23(8):157-157.
  • 7Talebian S, Hosseini M, Bagheri H, et al. Trunk muscle fatigue in subjects with a history of low back pain and a group of healthy controls measured by similarily index. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011 ;24:17-22.
  • 8Kawaguchi , Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21: 2683-2688.
  • 9戴胡明,夏睿,杨家赵,等.椎旁肌间隙入路和传统后正中入路在治疗胸腰段骨折对比研究[C].//安徽省医学会骨科学第十三次学术会议论文集.2012:254.257.
  • 10Jiang XZ., Tian W, Liu B, et al. Comparison of a paraspinal approach with a percutaneous approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior ligamentous complex injury: a prospective randomized controlled trial.J int Med Res. 2012;40(4):1343-1356.

共引文献106

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部