期刊文献+

Modeling considerations in seismic assessment of RC bridges using state-of-practice structural analysis software tools

Modeling considerations in seismic assessment of RC bridges using state-of-practice structural analysis software tools
原文传递
导出
摘要 The increasing awareness of the general society toward the seismic safety of structures has led to more restrictive performance requirements hence, many times, to the need of using new and more accurate methods of analysis of structures. Among these, nonlinear static procedures are becoming, evermore, the preferred choice of the majority of design codes, as an alternative to complete nonlinear time-history analysis for seismic design and assessment of structures. The many available software tools should therefore be evaluated and well understood, in order to be easily and soundly employed by the practitioners. The study presented herein intends to contribute to this need by providing further insight with respect to the use of commonly employed structural analysis software tools in nonlinear analysis of bridge structures. A comparison between different nonlinear modeling assumptions is presented, together with the comparison with real experimental results. Furthermore, alternative adaptive pushover procedures are proposed and applied to a case study bridge, based on a generic plastic hinge model. The adopted structural analysis program proved to be accurate, yielding reliable estimates, both in terms of local plastic hinge behavior and global structural behavior. The increasing awareness of the general society toward the seismic safety of structures has led to more restrictive performance requirements hence, many times, to the need of using new and more accurate methods of analysis of structures. Among these, nonlinear static procedures are becoming, evermore, the preferred choice of the majority of design codes, as an alternative to complete nonlinear time-history analysis for seismic design and assessment of structures. The many available software tools should therefore be evaluated and well understood, in order to be easily and soundly employed by the practitioners. The study presented herein intends to contribute to this need by providing further insight with respect to the use of commonly employed structural analysis software tools in nonlinear analysis of bridge structures. A comparison between different nonlinear modeling assumptions is presented, together with the comparison with real experimental results. Furthermore, alternative adaptive pushover procedures are proposed and applied to a case study bridge, based on a generic plastic hinge model. The adopted structural analysis program proved to be accurate, yielding reliable estimates, both in terms of local plastic hinge behavior and global structural behavior.
出处 《Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering》 SCIE EI CSCD 2018年第1期109-124,共16页 结构与土木工程前沿(英文版)
关键词 nonlinear analysis PUSHOVER RC bridges structural modelling software nonlinear analysis, pushover, RC bridges, structural modelling software
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献38

  • 1Bae S and Bayrak O (2008), "Plastic Hinge Length of Reinforced Concrete Columns," A CI Structural Journal 105: 290-300.
  • 2Bousias SN, Panagiotakos TB and Fardis MN (2002), "Modelling of RC Members under Cyclic Biaxial Flexure and Axial Force," Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 6(2): 213-238.
  • 3Calabrese A (2008), "Numerical Issues in Distributed Inelasticity Modelling of RC Frame Elements for Seismic Analysis," MsC, Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia, Universith degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia.
  • 4Calabrese A, Almeida JP andPinho R (2010), "Numerical Issues in Distributed Inelasticity Modeling of RC Frame Elements for Seismic Analysis," Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 14: 38-68.
  • 5Casciati F (1989), "Stochastic Dynamics of Hysteretic Media," Structural Safety, 6(2-4): 259-269.
  • 6CEB (1996), RC Frames under Earthquake Loading, Lausanne Bulletin 220.
  • 7Dragovich JJ and Lepage A (2009), "FDE Index for Goodness-of-fit Between Measured and Calculated Response Signals," Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 38:1751-1758.
  • 8Duarte RT (1991), "The Use of Analytical Methods in Structural Design for Earthquake Resistance," in Experimental and Numerical Methods in Earthquake Engineering, J. Donea and P. M. Jones, Eds., ed: Commission of the European Communities, Joint Research Center, Ispra Establishment, 149-174.
  • 9E1Mandooh Galal K and Ghobarah A (2003), "Flexural and Shear Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Variable Axial Load," Engineering Structures, 25:1353-1367.
  • 10Fardis MN (1991), "Member-type Models for the Nonlinear Seismic Response of Reinforced Concrete Structures," in Experimental and Numerical Methods in Earthquake Engineering, D. a. P. M. Jones, Ed., ed: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部