期刊文献+

保留左结肠动脉及直肠上动脉的腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术的临床应用及近期疗效分析 被引量:14

Clinical application and short-term curative effect analysis in preservation of left colon artery and superior rectal artery for the laparoscopic resection of sigmoid colon carcinoma
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨保留左结肠动脉及直肠上动脉的乙状结肠癌手术的具体操作技术及临床可行性,并与传统术式进行对比。方法:回顾分析2015年1月至2016年11月为82例患者行腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术的临床资料,将患者分为保留血管组(n=24)与传统术式组(n=58)。保留血管组行保留左结肠动脉及直肠上动脉的乙状结肠癌根治术,传统术式组行不保留上述血管的根治术。比较两组手术时间、淋巴结清扫数量、术中出血量、吻合口愈合情况等指标。结果:两组淋巴结清扫数量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);保留血管组手术时间长于传统术式组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);保留血管组患者未发生吻合口瘘,传统组发生2例,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:保留左结肠动脉及直肠上动脉的腹腔镜乙状结肠癌根治术安全、可行,具有良好的临床应用前景。 Objective: To study the operative techniques and clinical feasibility of preservation of left colon artery and superior rectal artery for the laparoscopic resection of sigmoid colon carcinoma,and to compare it with the traditional surgical method. Methods:From Jan. 2015 to Nov. 2016,clinical data of 82 patients with sigmoid colon carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into retained vascular group and traditional surgical group. Twenty-four patients were enrolled in the retained vascular group,while 58 patients were enrolled in the traditional surgical group. The retained vascular group kept left colon artery and superior rectal artery,while the traditional surgical group received conventional surgery. The operation time,number of resected lymph nodes,blood loss and anastomotic healing status were compared between the two groups. Results: The mean operation time was( 279. 43 ±47. 21) min,the mean harvested lymph node was( 15. 2 ± 5. 4) and the mean blood loss was( 53. 32 ± 15. 68) ml in the retained vascular group. The number of resected lymph nodes and blood loss were not statistically significantly different between these two groups( P〉0. 05). Longer operating time was observed in the retained vascular group as compared to the traditional surgical group( P〈0. 05).There was no anastomotic fistula in the retained vascular group,however,two anastomotic fistula occurred in the traditional surgical group,there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups( P〉0. 05). Conclusions: Preservation of left colon artery and superior rectal artery is safe and feasible for the laparoscopic treatment of sigmoid colon carcinoma and has good clinical application prospect.
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2017年第12期903-906,共4页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
基金 山东省自然科学基金资助项目(编号:ZR2014HQ044)
关键词 乙状结肠肿瘤 乙状结肠癌根治术 腹腔镜检查 左结肠动脉 直肠上动脉 Sigmoid neoplasms Radical operation for sigmoid colon cancer Laparoscopy Left colon artery Superior rectal artery
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1Elftmann TD, Nelson H, Ota DM, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted segmental eoleetomy: surgical techniques [J]. Mayo Clin Proc, 1994,69 : 825-833.
  • 2Milsom JW, B~hm B, Decanini C, et al. Laparoscopic oncologic proctosigmoidectomy with low colorectal anastomosis in a cadaver model [J]. Surg Endosc, 1994,8: 1117-1123.
  • 3Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonier HJ, et al. European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) [J]. Surg Endosc, 2004.18 : 1163-1185.
  • 4Athanasiou T, A1-Ruzzeh S, Kumar P, et al. Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2004,77:745-753.
  • 5Day W, Lau PY. Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection, is it a fair comparison? [J]. World J Surg, 2010,34:1146-1147.
  • 6Poon JT, Law WL, Fan JK, et al. Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection [J~. World J Surg, 2009,33:2177-2182.
  • 7Rothohz NA, Bun ME, Tessio M, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy: medial versus lateral approach [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2009, 19:43-47.
  • 8Liang JT, Lai HS, Huang KC, et al. Comparison of medial-to- lateral versus traditional lateral-to-medial laparoscopie dissection sequences for resection of rectosigmoid cancers: randomized controlled clinical trial [J]. World J Surg, 2003,27 : 190-196.
  • 9Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, et al. A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoseopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for colorectal cancer [J]. J Cancer, 2011,2:425-434.
  • 10Pigazzi A, Hellan M, Ewing DR, et al. Laparoscopic medial- to-lateral colon dissection: how and why [J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2007,11 :778-782.

共引文献19

同被引文献124

引证文献14

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部