期刊文献+

基于Meta分析的维药祖卡木颗粒治疗上呼吸道感染临床评价研究 被引量:7

Meta-analysis on Zukamu Granules in Treatment for Upper Respiratory Infection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:采用Meta分析方法评价维药祖卡木颗粒治疗上呼吸道感染的疗效及安全性。方法:根据检索关键词,通过计算机检索中英文数据库(中国期刊全文数据库、中文科技期刊数据库、万方数据库和SCIFINDER),搜集单独或联合使用祖卡木颗粒(试验组)对比常规药物(对照组)治疗上呼吸道感染的随机对照试验(RCTs);根据纳入排除标准筛选文献,对符合标准的临床研究进行资料提取,并按照Cochrane系统评价员手册5.1.0进行偏倚风险评价,采用Rev Man 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入10项RCTs,合计1 506例患者。Meta分析结果显示,试验组的总有效率(OR=1.97,95%CI:1.47~2.65,P<0.000 01)、痊愈率(OR=2.07,95%CI:1.67~2.58,P<0.000 01)、改善流涕(OR=-0.90,95%CI:-1.37^-0.43,P=0.000 2)、鼻塞(OR=-0.43,95%CI:-0.60^-0.26,P<0.000 01)、咳嗽(OR=-1.31,95%CI:-1.54^-1.08,P<0.000 01)、咽喉肿痛(OR=-0.49,95%CI:-0.71^-0.27,P<0.000 1)、头痛(OR=-0.75,95%CI:-1.16^-0.34,P=0.000 3)、发热(OR=-2.94,95%CI:-3.39^-2.49,P<0.000 01)等结果均优于对照组,其差异均有统计学差异意义;另外,3项研究分别报道了在治疗期间出现皮疹、恶心呕吐或轻微不良反应,所有症状均不影响治疗。结论:单独或联用祖卡木颗粒治疗上呼吸道感染具有一定的疗效,且未增加不良反应风险。但由于本Meta分析纳入研究质量不高,有必要开展更多设计严谨、大样本、多中心RCTs加以验证。 Objective: To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of Zukamu granules in treatment of upper respiratory infection with Meta-analysis method. Methods: Retrieved from CJFD,VIP Database,Wanfang Database,and SCIFINDER,clinical trials about alone or combined with Zukamu granules( test group) versus other conventional medicines( control group) in the treatment of upper respiratory infection were collected. Meta-analysis was performed using Rev Man 5. 3 software after data extracting and assessing risk of bias using Cochrane system evaluation manual 5. 1. 0. Results: Totally 10 RCTs were enrolled,involving 1 506 patients. Results of Meta-analysis showed total effective rate( OR =1. 97,95% CI: 1. 47-2. 65,P 0. 000 01),total cure rate( OR = 2. 07,95% CI: 1. 67-2. 58,P 0. 000 01),clinical signs such as runny nose( OR =-0. 90,95% CI:-1. 37--0. 43,P = 0. 000 2),stuffy nose( OR =-0. 43,95% CI:-0. 60--0. 26,P 0. 000 01),cough( OR =-1. 31,95% CI:-1. 54--1. 08,P 0. 000 01),sore throat( OR =-0. 49,95% CI:-0. 71--0. 27,P 0. 000 1),headache( OR =-0. 75,95% CI:-1. 16--0. 34,P = 0. 000 3),fever( OR =-2. 94,95% CI:-3. 39--2. 49,P 0. 000 01) in test group were sigitificantly better than control group,the differences were statistically significant between two groups; three studies reported a rash,nausea and vomiting or mild adverse reactions during treatment,respectively. Conclusion: The effectiveness of Zukamu granules alone or in combination with other particles shown better curative effection on upper respiratory infection,and less adverse reactions. Given that the only several low-quality cases were included in this Meta-analysis,more RCTs with rigorous design,large scale and multi-center were needed for further corroboration of this tendency.
出处 《药物流行病学杂志》 CAS 2018年第2期73-77,84,共6页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
基金 国家中医药管理局科技项目(编号:ZYBZH-C-XJ-56)
关键词 祖卡木颗粒 上呼吸道感染 疗效 安全性 系统评价 META分析 Zukamu granules Upper respiratory infection Effectiveness Safety Systematic review Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献48

  • 1王文本,哈力旦.艾山,胡坚,陈蔚如,刘发.祖卡木冲剂的临床和药效研究[J].新疆中医药,1995,13(3):43-45. 被引量:5
  • 2欧敏,杜怀棠,郭元吉,姜良铎,郝瑞福,焦杨,史利卿,杨效华.清肺饮抗小鼠流感病毒性肺炎的实验研究[J].中华实验和临床病毒学杂志,1996,10(4):381-383. 被引量:40
  • 3斯拉甫 哈木拉提 努尔买买提 等.祖卡木无糖颗粒抗炎作用的实验研究[J].中国药理学通讯,1998,15(4):38-38.
  • 4中华人民共和国卫生部药品标准.维吾尔药分册[S].1999,175.
  • 5朱贵卿.呼吸内科学[M].11版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1988:244-248.
  • 6易沙克江·马合穆德.中国医学百科全书-维吾尔医学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2005:234.
  • 7阿不力米提·玉素甫阿吉,等.维吾尔医诊断学[M].维吾尔文版.乌鲁木齐:新疆科技卫生出版社,1984:235.
  • 8中华人民共和国卫生部.中药新药临床研究指导原则[S].,1997.147.
  • 9国家医药管理局中草药情报中心站.植物药有效成分手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1986.852-852.
  • 10全国中草药汇编编写组.全国中草药汇编(上册)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1976.525-526.

共引文献46

同被引文献114

引证文献7

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部