摘要
刑事证据的相互印证是我国刑事诉讼独特的证明模式。从理论探讨的角度来看,目前针对印证模式的探讨大多局限于审判阶段静态化的视角,罕有放眼于印证模式各阶段动态化的审视。在我国刑事诉讼中,刑事证据的印证模式具有着三种样态,分别为印证模式下的证据产生、证据确定及证据使用。刑事证据的相互印证虽颇为合理,但也有弊端。因此,从产生阶段、确定阶段、使用阶段多角度对现有制度进行规制,有助于刑事证据印证模式的优化转型。
The confirmation of evidence is the mode of proof in China's criminal procedure. From the view of theory,the discussions towards the mode always take a static view,limiting within the trial stage with a dynamic view. Based on this,in the criminal proceeding,the confirmations of criminal evidence include three modes,i. e. the production,verification and application. The confirmation of criminal evidence is partly reasonable,but many defectsare still found. Therefore,the present rules should be regulated from the above three modes to improve the optimization of transformation of the confirmation.
出处
《昆明学院学报》
2018年第1期61-66,共6页
Journal of Kunming University
关键词
印证模式
刑事证据
运行样态
印证证据
完善路径
the mode of confirmation
criminal evidence
pattern of operation
mutual verification of evidence
perfecting path
