摘要
大陆法系主要国家和地区出于立法技术上的考虑,普遍允许在行政诉讼中准用民事诉讼规则,并在准用方式上逐渐由概括准用向具体准用过渡。尽管我国《行政诉讼法》对此最初并未规定,但司法实践中一直通过前后两个司法解释的规定参照民事诉讼规则,直到新法第101条正式确立这一制度。但该条的问题在于:一是对可准用范围的不完全列举仍属于概括准用,需要法官、检察官耗费精力找法;二是"适用"的表述使得他们只能被动地援引法条,无法真正结合具体案情决定准用问题;三是旧法司法解释的准用性规则并未废止,在一定程度上制约了本条的适用。这有待未来出台专门司法解释对相关条款作明确列举,对相关表述作扩大解释,并确定各种规则的先后援引顺序。
The main countries and regions of continental law system generally allow for the application of rules of civil procedure in administrative litigation because of legislative and technical considerations, and they gradually shift from the principle of universal access to the concrete permitting. Although China＇s ＂Administrative Procedure Law＂ did not initially provide for this, but the judicial practice has been through two judicial interpretation of the provisions with reference to the rules of civil procedure until the new law, Article 101 formally established the system. However, there are some problemsabout this article. The first is that the incomplete list of available scopes still falls within the scope of general guidelines and requires judges and prosecutors to spend time and energy. The second, the expression ＂applicable＇only allows them to passively invoke the law. The third, the legal precedent of the judicial interpretation of the old law has not been abolished, which restricted the application of this article.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期118-126,共9页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
基金
2017年江苏警官学院哲学社会科学研究面上项目"我国行政诉讼中民事诉讼规则准用问题研究"(2017SJYSQO8)的最终成果
江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
江苏高校品牌专业建设工程资助项目(TAPP)(PPZY2015C203)
2015年全国公安高等教育重点专业建设点资助项目
江苏警官学院高层次人才科研启动费(JSPI17GKZR401)资助
关键词
行政诉讼
民事诉讼规则
准用性规则
适用
Administrative.Litigation
Civil Litigation Rules
Permissibly ApplicableRules
Application
