摘要
目的总结剖宫产术硬膜外麻醉与蛛网膜下腔麻醉的临床效果,选择剖宫产最优麻醉方案。方法选择2014年5月~2016年1月期间我院行剖宫产手术的180例产妇作为实验对象,并进行随机分组,每组90例。实验组90例产妇行蛛网膜下腔麻醉,参照组90例产妇行硬膜外麻醉,对比两组剖宫产产妇的麻醉起效时间、镇痛效果、不良反应发生率以及麻醉满意度。结果实验组患者麻醉满意度高于参照组,数据差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。另外,组间麻醉起效时间、不良反应发生率对比,实验组均优于参照组,数据差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。组间镇痛效果对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论剖宫产行蛛网膜下腔麻醉具有麻醉起效快、镇痛效果显著、不良反应发生率低、麻醉满意度高等优势,符合产妇需求,具有推行价值。
To summarize the clinical effect of epidural anesthesia and subarachnoid space anesthesia in cesar-ean section, and select the optimal anesthesia program for cesarean section. Methods 180 parturients undergoing cesarean sec-tion in our hospital from May 2014 to January 2016were selected as experimental subjects and randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group （90 cases） received subarachnoid space anesthesia, and the reference group （90 cases） un-derwent epidural anesthesia. The onset time,analgesic effect, adverse reaction rate and anesthesia satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results The anesthesia satisfaction of the experimental group was higher than that of the reference group, the difference was statistically significant （P〈0. 05）. In addition, the time of onset of anesthesia and the incidence of adverse reactions between groups were better than those in the reference group, and the difference of the data was statistically significant （P〈C〇 . 05）. There was no significant difference in the analgesic effect between groups （P〉0. 05）. Conclusion The subarachnoid space anesthesia for cesarean section has the advantages of rapid onset of anesthesia, significant analgesic effect, low incidence of adverse reactions and high anesthesia satisfaction. It meets the needs of women and has practical value.
出处
《临床研究》
2018年第1期33-34,共2页
Clinical Research
关键词
蛛网膜下腔麻醉
剖宫产术
硬膜外麻醉
镇痛效果
不良反应
subarachnoid space anesthesia
cesarean section
epidural anesthesia
analgesia effect
adverse reaction
