期刊文献+

当代功利主义平等观论析 被引量:5

Research on the Contemporary Utilitarian Conceptions of Equality
原文传递
导出
摘要 平等是政治哲学的重要价值。传统观点认为,功利主义以个人效用最大化为基本取向,与平等价值的相关度很低。但是经过长期嬗变,当代西方功利主义已然具有平等的价值取向,其建构逻辑一定程度上自洽地实现了功利最大化与平等待人的统一。当代功利主义超越了传统功利主义平等的基础,在道德可能性与现实可行性两个方面论证了功利最大化与平等待人的相容性,提供了符合平等要求的分配结果,并回应了学术界对其平等问题的诸多批评。但是当代功利主义没有超越传统功利主义的理论逻辑和思维轨道。运用马克思主义研究方法发现,当代西方功利主义平等观在理论基础、基本内容和主要观点方面均存在根本的缺陷,只有马克思主义平等观的哲学基础和社会主张,才是解决社会平等的本真论证和现实路径。 Equality is an important value in the political philosophy. According to the traditional point of the view,utilitarian only pay attention to utility maximization,neglecting the value of equality.But the contemporary utilitarianism has possessed the characteristics of egalitarianism during a long period of evolution. The contemporary utilitarianism provides a better basis of equality than the classical utilitarianism. The theory demonstrates compatibility between utility maximization and equality principle on both moral possibility and realistic feasibility,and generates egalitarian distribution outcomes.Moreover,the contemporary utilitarianism responds lots of forceful criticisms improving its equality theory. Nonetheless,the theory doesn`t completely get rid of previous logic and research path of the classical utilitarianism. According to Marxist analysis method,there are some foundational flaws on theoretical basis,basic content and main points of the contemporary utilitarianism. As a result,only equality theory of Marxist is the real principle and approch to solve the social equality issues.
出处 《政治学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第6期24-33,共10页 CASS Journal of Political Science
基金 国家社会科学重大项目"推进国家治理体系现代化研究"(014ZDA011)的研究成果 国家"万人计划"哲学社会科学领军人才项目"当代中国治理模式研究"的研究成果
关键词 当代功利主义 平等 评析 contemporary utilitarianism equality review
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1Bernard Williams. "The Idea of Equality". In Philosophy, Politics, and Society, Series ]][ , Basil Blackwell, 1962.
  • 2John Rawls. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.
  • 3Nicholas Mark Smith. Basic Equality and Discrimination. Surrey, UK: Ashgate, 2011.
  • 4Bernard Williams. "The Idea of Equality". In Philosophy, Politics, and Society, Series II (Basil Blackwell, 1962).
  • 5David Miller. "Arguments of Equality". In Peter French et al (ed.). Midwest Studies in Philosophy: Vg. Social and Political Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
  • 6Isaiah Berlin. "Equality". In Peter Vallentyne (ed.). Equality and Justice. Volume 2. New York: Routledge, 2003.
  • 7Donald Dworkin. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1977.
  • 8J. R. Lucas. "Against Equality". Philosophy, 1965 (40).
  • 9Stanley I. Benn. "Egualitarianism and the Equal Consideration oI Interests". In J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman (ed.). Nomos 1X Equality. New York.. New York University Press, 1967.
  • 10Thomas Nagel. Equality and Partiality. New York.. Oxford University Press, 1991.

共引文献4

同被引文献49

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部