摘要
目的比较在全肺切除术围术期中应用持续负压胸腔引流方式与常规胸腔引流管夹闭方式的临床效果。方法选取120例进行全肺切除术后患者作为研究对象，采用随机数字表法将其分成两组，每组60例。对照组采用常规胸腔引流管夹闭方式，观察组采用持续负压胸腔引流方式，比较两组临床效果。结果观察组住院时间、引流总量及引流管留置时间均高于对照组，观察组并发症总发生率为13．33％，低于对照组的23．33％，但差异均无统计学意义（t=1．60、1．97、0．72，x2=2．00，均P〉0．05）。结论在全肺切除术围术期中应用持续负压胸腔引流方式与常规胸腔引流管夹闭方式的临床效果接近，值得临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the clinical effects between open thoracic drainage and conventional thoracie drainage tube applicated in patients after pneumonectomy. Methods 120 cases after pneumoneetomy were selected as research subjects, and they were randomly divided into two groups according to the digital table, 60 cases in each group. The control group was given conventional thoracic drainage tube, while the observation group received open thoracic drainage ,The clinical effects were compared between the two groups. Results The length of hospital stay, total drainage and retention time of drainage tube in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group, the overall incidence rate of complications in the observation group was 13.33% , which was lower than 23.33% in the control group,but there were no statistically significant differences （ t = 1.60,1.97,0.72, X2 = 2.00, all P 〉 O. 05 ）. Conclusion Open thoracic drainage has similar clinical effect with conventional thoracic drainage tube on patients after pneumonectomy,it is worthy to be promoted clinically.
出处
《中国基层医药》
CAS
2017年第24期3730-3732,共3页
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
