摘要
关于毒品交易居间行为的性质,《禁毒法》与最高司法机关的司法解释持不同的态度,学界存在"无罪说""贩卖毒品罪说""因情定性说"等三种不同的主张。结合中国刑法既定性又定量的特点,根据共同犯罪理论分析,毒品交易居间行为不能简单地一概以犯罪论处,也不能简单地一概不以犯罪论处,更不宜一概以某种犯罪论处,需要根据其所依附的行为,以及居间行为对毒品交易的促进作用来确定。毒品交易中居间介绍行为原则上应依《禁毒法》追究行政责任,居间实行行为除两种情形外,原则上要以毒品犯罪的共犯处理。在确定毒品交易居间行为与哪一方成立共同犯罪以及定何种犯罪时,需要分类根据共同犯罪理论确定。
With regard to the nature of the mediation behavior of drug trade,the"anti-drug law"and the judicial interpretation of the supreme judicial organs hold different assertions.There are three different academic opinions presented as:"innocence","crime of trafficking"and"discretion based on different circumstances".Based on the analysis of the common criminal theory,mediation behaviors in drug trades can’t be simply t criminalized,nor can it be simply not punished;.It is also inappropriate to take them as certain kind of crime.We should determine their properties according to the behavior conducted,and the impact of mediating behavior on drug trafficking.The act of intervening introducing in drug trading should be investigated for administrative responsibility in accordance with the"anti-drug law".The act of intervening practice should be dealt with as an accomplice in principle except the two cases.It depends on the theory of joint crime to determine which party conducted joint crime and what kind of crime has been committed.
出处
《云南社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第6期104-111,共8页
Social Sciences in Yunnan
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目"现代风险的治理与非传统安全的刑法保障"(项目号:13AFX011)的阶段性成果
