摘要
在过去的几十年间,流动性正在不断冲击城市、社会、国家的传统定义,并引发人们重新思考不同形式的流动究竟如何改变了社会的内在结构。在"稳定取向"和"变动取向"两种城市观的张力中,城市治理陷入封闭与开放之间的内在两难。在"流动性社会"来临的背景下,长期居于主导地位的地域性治理表现出了很大的治理限度,并持续地受到来自流动性治理的挑战。在当下中国语境下,流动性是否正在重构城市社会治理的现实基础?流动性治理又是否能够成为超越地域性治理的替代性方案?城市选择何种治理模式来更好地回应经济社会的挑战,这本身需要在不断变化的社会现实和多元的治理实践方案中加以反思和讨论。
In the past few decades,the increasing mobility has greatly challenged traditional definitions of city,society and the nation-state and pushed people to rethink about how different forms of mobility have reconstructed the internal structure of society. Between ＂stable oriented＂and ＂fluid oriented＂understandings of city,urban governance falls into a tension between closure and openness. With the arrival of ＂mobile society＂,the dominant regional governance shows its limits. It is also gradually challenged by mobility governance. Is mobility reconstructing the formative condition of urban governance in today＇s China？ Can mobility governance become an alternative to regional governance？ We need discuss and reflect on which kind of urban governance can respond to economic and social challenges more effectively in the changing social reality and multiple governance methods.
出处
《华东师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第6期51-60,共10页
Journal of East China Normal University（Humanities and Social Sciences）
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"有序推进农业转移人口市民化研究"(13&ZD043)和"社会治理背景下我国社会工作行动本土化理论框架与实践体系研究"(16ZDA084)
2017年度上海市教委人文社会科学重大项目"社会转型的中国实践与转型社会学的建构"(201701070005E00041)
2017年度上海市哲学社会科学规划青年课题"大都市郊区农民的选择性市民化及其流动分化研究"(2017ESH008)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目资助(2017ECNU-HLYT018)
关键词
地域性治理
流动性治理
城市社会治理
治理论争
regional governance
mobility governance
urban social governance
controversy on governance
