期刊文献+

Active explorers show low learning performance in a social insect 被引量:3

原文传递
导出
摘要 An intriguing question in behavioral biology is whether consistent individual differences (calledanimal personalities) relate to variation in cognitive performance because commonly measuredpersonality traits may be associated with risk-reward trade-offs. Social insects, whose learningabilities have been extensively characterized, show consistent behavioral variability, both at colonyand at individual level. We investigated the possible link between personality traits and learningperformance in the carpenter ant Camponotus aethiops. Exploratory activity, sociability, and ag-gression were assessed twice in ant foragers. Behaviors differed among individuals, they werepartly repeatable across time and exploratory activity correlated positively with aggression.Learning abilities were quantified by differential conditioning of the maxilla-labium extension re-sponse, a task that requires cue perception and information storage. We found that exploratory ac-tivity of individual ants significantly predicted learning performance: "active-explorers" wereslower in learning the task than "inactive-explorers". The results suggest for the first time a link be-tween a personality trait and cognitive performance in eusocial insects, and that the underlying in-dividual variability could affect colony performance and success.
出处 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2017年第5期555-560,共6页 动物学报(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献57

  • 1Azcarate FM, Kovacs E, Peco B, 2007. Microclimatic conditions regulate surface activity in harvester ants Messor barbarus. Journal of Insect Behavior 20: 315-329.
  • 2Ben-Shahar Y, Robichon A, Sokolowski MB, Robinson GE, 2002. Influence of gene action across different time scales on behavior. Science 296: 741-744.
  • 3Beverly BD, McLendon H, Nacu S, Holmes S, Gordon DM, 2009. How site fidelity leads to individual differences in the foraging activity of harvester ants. Behavioural Ecology 20: 633-638.
  • 4Breed MD, Williams DB, Queral A, 2002. Demand for task performance and workforce replacement: Undertakers in honeybee Apis mellifera colonies. Journal of Insect Behavior 15: 319-329.
  • 5Burd M, Shiwakoti N, Sarvi M, Rose G, 2010. Nest architecture and traffic flow: Large potential effects from small structural features. Ecological Entomology 35: 464-468.
  • 6Calderone NW, 1995. Temporal division-of-labor in the honey-bee Apis mellifera: A developmental process or the result of environmental influences. Canadian Journal of Zoology 73: 1410-1416.
  • 7Camargo RS, Forti LC, Lopes JFS, Andrade APP, Ottati ALT, 2007. Age polyethism in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex subterraneus brunneus Forel, 1911 (Hym., Formicidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 131: 139-145.
  • 8Cole BJ, Smith AA, Huber ZJ, Wiernasz DC, 2010. The structure of foraging activity in colonies of the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Behavioural Ecology 21: 337-342.
  • 9Crosland MWJ, 1990. Variation in ant aggression and kin discrimination ability within and between colonies. Journal of Insect Behavior 3: 359-379.
  • 10Dingemanse NJ, Kazem AJN, Reale D, Wright J, 2010. Behavioural reaction norms: Animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 81-89.

共引文献13

同被引文献6

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部