摘要
有关《1844年经济学哲学手稿》的评价一直存在争议,除了意识形态立场的分殊和评判标准的不同外,对文本构型和叙事逻辑的误识不能不说是重要缘由。基于MEGA1和MEGA2中《巴黎笔记》所呈现的文本样态,再比照"逻辑编排版"和"原文写作顺序版"的差异,以祛除人们依据中文版构型所造成的误判。继而说明作为马克思独创的分析工具之"异化劳动"何以可能,以及异化劳动何以成为私有财产的根源,而学理上的共产主义运动正是要扬弃那种有悖于人的"类本质"之异化劳动和由私有财产羽化出的诸多社会怪状。
The evaluation of Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 has always been controversial. In addition to the difference of the ideological stand and the standard of judgment,the misunderstanding of the text fragment and narrative logic is an important reason.Based on the textual description of the Paris Notes in MEGA1 and MEGA2,compared the differences between 'logic edition'and 'original sequential edition',the author tries to get rid of many misunderstandings that caused by the fragment of Chinese version. Then it explains why the 'alienated labor'as Marx's original analytical tool is possible,and how alienated labor became the root of private property. The Communist movement in theory is to develop and discard this alienated labor which goes against the human nature and many strange social phenomenon caused by private property.
出处
《阅江学刊》
2017年第5期85-94,共10页
Yuejiang Academic Journal
基金
江苏省教育厅重点课题"马克思政治哲学与西方政治哲学两大基本范式的比较分析及其意识形态功效研究"(2017ZDIXM158)
关键词
1844年手稿
文本构型
叙事逻辑
Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844
the text fragment
narrative logic
