期刊文献+

政策风险、角色预期与中国企业对外直接投资绩效 被引量:4

Policy Risk,Role Expectations and Outward Foreign Direct Investment Performance of Chinese Enterprises
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 东道国政策风险与跨国企业对外直接投资绩效之间的关系一直是学术界与实务界关注的焦点。基于制度理论的能动性视角,以中国沪深A股上市公司在2004-2013年投资建立的海外子公司为样本进行实证检验,系统分析东道国政策风险对中国企业对外直接投资绩效的影响,同时探讨所有权性质与东道国经验对政策风险与对外直接投资绩效之间关系的调节作用。结果表明,东道国政策风险与中国企业对外直接投资绩效之间具有显著的正相关关系;中国企业的东道国经验对政策风险与对外直接投资绩效之间的关系存在正向调节作用;中国企业所有权性质的调节作用没有通过验证。结论深化和丰富了东道国政策风险与中国企业对外直接投资绩效之间关系的理论研究,同时也为中国企业如何在政策风险高的东道国获得高对外直接投资绩效提供了一定的实践指导,中国企业应该使得政治战略与市场战略协同配合共同发展。 The relationship between policy risk and outward foreign direct investment( OFDI) performance of multinational enterprises has always been the emphasis in the academic circle and business world.Based on agency perspective of institutional theory,overseas subsidiaries of listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen A share market from 2004 to 2013 are studied,this study uses STATA 12. 0 software to empirically analyze and examine. This paper analyzes effects of policy risk on OFDI performance of Chinese enterprises and also examines moderating effects of ownership property of Chinese enterprises and host country experience.The empirical results show that: policy risk of host country has a significantly positive correlation with OFDI performance of Chinese enterprises; Chinese enterprises' host country experience plays a positive role in the relationship between policy risk and OFDI performance; the moderating effect of ownership property of Chinese enterprises is not varied. This paper deepens and enriches the research findings about the relationship between policy risk of host country and OFDI performance of Chinese enterprises. The above-mentioned findings draw implications for Chinese enterprises in gaining higher OFDI performance when they enter country with high policy risk.
出处 《产经评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期95-111,共17页 Industrial Economic Review
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目"组织身份变革及意义给赋:克服外来者劣势的动态机制研究"(批准号:15AGL006 项目负责人:杜晓君)
关键词 政策风险 对外直接投资绩效 制度创业 角色预期 policy risk outward foreign direct investment performance institutional entrepreneurship role expectations
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献208

  • 1阎大颖.制度距离、国际经验与中国企业海外并购的成败问题研究[J].南开经济研究,2011(5):75-97. 被引量:124
  • 2刘璐.企业外部网络对企业绩效影响研究:基于吸收能力视角[D].济南:山东大学,2008.
  • 3Regner P, Zander U. Knowledge and strategy creation in multinational companies: Social- identity frames and temporary tension in knowledge combination [ J ]. Man- agement International Review, 2011, 51 (6) : 821 - 850.
  • 4Kostova T. Transnational transfer of strategic organiza- tional practices: A contextual perspective [ J]. Acade- my of Management Review, 1999, 24(2) : 308 -324.
  • 5Jensen R, Szulanski G. Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross - border knowledge transfers [ J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2004, 35(6): 508-521.
  • 6Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the firm and the evo- lutionary theory of the multinational corporation [ J ].Journal of International Business Studies, 1993, 24 (4) : 625 - 645.
  • 7Qin C, Ramburuth P, Wang Y. A conceptual model of cultural distance, MNC subsidiary roles, and knowledge transfer in China - based subsidiaries [ J ]. Organiza- tions and Markets in Emerging Economies, 2011, 2 (2) : 10 -27.
  • 8Massingham P. Managing knowledge transfer between parent country nationals (Australia) and host country nationals (Asia) [ J ]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2010, 21 (9) : 1414 - 1435.
  • 9Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension [ M ]. London: Rout- ledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.
  • 10Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm [ J]. Stra- tegic Management Journal, 1996, 17:27-43.

共引文献174

同被引文献54

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部