期刊文献+

南京市紫金山土壤中6种重金属的污染特征和污染水平评价 被引量:5

Pollution characteristics and pollution level evaluation of 6 heavy metals in Purple Mountain soil,Nanjing
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探究人类活动对南京市紫金山国家森林公园土壤重金属污染的影响,研究了紫金山土壤中6种重金属(Cu、Zn、Pb、Cr、Ni、Mn)的污染特征,并采用单因子指数法和内梅罗综合指数法进行了污染水平评价。结果表明:Cu的质量浓度范围为4.21~249.75mg/kg,平均值为64.08mg/kg;Zn的质量浓度范围为155.26~418.75mg/kg,平均值为212.34mg/kg;Pb的质量浓度范围为112.19~608.91mg/kg,平均值为319.57mg/kg;Cr的质量浓度范围为29.54~201.25mg/kg,平均值为127.36mg/kg;Ni的质量浓度范围为46.64~142.48mg/kg,平均值为76.16mg/kg;Mn的质量浓度范围为182.59~1 634.48mg/kg,平均值为1 008.93mg/kg。总体而言,上层样(0~20cm)的重金属浓度高于下层样(20~40cm),高海拔的重金属浓度低于低海拔的。内梅罗综合指数表明,所有采样点均处于重度污染状态。分析6种重金属的单因子指数发现,主要是因为Pb的单因子指数较大。 In order to explore influence of human activities on soil of Purple Mountain Forest Park in Nanjing, pollution characteristics of 6 heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Pb,Cr, Ni, Mn) were studied. Moreover, pollution level evaluation was conducted using single factor index method and Nemero comprehensive index method. Results showed that Cu mass concentrations ranged from 4.21 to 249.75 mg/kg with an average of 64.08 mg/kg,Zn ranged from 155.26 to 418.75 mg/kg with an average of 212.34 mg/kg,Pb ranged from 112.19 to 608.91 mg/kg with an average of 319.57 mg/kg,Cr ranged from 29.54 to 201.25 mg/kg with an average of 127.36 mg/kg,Ni ranged from 46.64 to 142.48 mg/kg with an average of 76.16 mg/kg,and Mn ranged from 182.59 to 1 634.48 mg/kg with an average of 1 008.93 mg/kg. In general,heavy metal mass concentrations of upper samples (0-20 era) were higher than that of lower ones (20-40 era),and that of high altitude lower than that of low altitude. Nemero comprehensive index implied that all samples were at heavy pollution level. Pb were found to be the main contributor through single factor index analysis.
出处 《环境污染与防治》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第10期1058-1062,共5页 Environmental Pollution & Control
基金 国家自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(No.51308300) 江苏省高校优势学科建设工程项目(No.PAPD)
关键词 紫金山 土壤 重金属 评价 Purple Mountain soil heavy metal evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献58

  • 1刘玉,李林立,赵柯,王丽丽,饶懿.岩溶山地石漠化地区不同土地利用方式下的土壤物理性状分析[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(5):142-145. 被引量:64
  • 2秦远好,谢德体,魏朝富,杨剑虹,屈明.土壤生态环境对游憩活动冲击的响应研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(3):61-65. 被引量:22
  • 3王天阳,王国祥.昆承湖水质参数空间分布特征研究[J].环境科学学报,2007,27(8):1384-1390. 被引量:69
  • 4Mielke H W,Gonzales C R,Smith M K, et al. The urban environment and children's health:Soils as integrator of lead,zinc, and cadmium in New Orleans, Louisiana, U. S. A. [J]. Environmental Research, 1999,81(2) :117-129.
  • 5Hakanson L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control. A sedimentological approach[J]. Water Research, 1980, 14(8) :975-1001.
  • 6Ferndndez J A,Carballeira A. Evaluation of contamination, by different elements,in terrestrial mosses[J]. Archives of Envi- ronmental Contamination and Toxicology,2001,40(4) :461-468.
  • 7中国环境监测总站.中国土壤元素背景值[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1990..
  • 8Douglas M C. Recreational impacts on erosion and runoff in a central Arizona riparian area [J]. Soil and Water Conservation, 1998, 53(1): 38-42.
  • 9Cole D N. Research on soil and vegetation in wilderness[R]. A State-of-Knowledge Review, USDA Forest Service GTR INT- 220, 1987.
  • 10Cilimburg A. Wildland recreation and human waste: A review of problems, practices and concerns[J].Environment Management, 1999,125(6):587-592.

共引文献34

同被引文献78

引证文献5

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部