摘要
如果人工智能生成的内容在表现形式上不符合作品的构成要件,如计算机生成的无独创性数据库,当然不能作为作品受到保护。但如果人工智能生成的内容在表现形式与人类创作的作品类似,如机器人绘制的图画、写出的新闻报道或谱出的乐曲,则需要从其产生过程判断其是否构成作品。迄今为止这些内容都是应用算法、规则和模板的结果,不能体现创作者独特的个性,并不能被认定为作品。在不披露相关内容由人工智能生成时,该内容可能因具备作品的表现形式而实际受到了保护,但该现象是举证规则造成的,并不意味着著作权法因人工智能而改变。
If the form of content generated by artificial intelligence does not meet the criteria of work, such as unorigi- nal database, it is certainly not a work protected by the copyright law. However, in respect of pictures, news reports and music which are drawn, written or composed by artificial intelligence, and the forms of which are similar to works created by human beings, the process of producing such contents should he analyzed to tell whether the contents are copyrightable works. So far the contents generated by artificial intelligence are the results of application of arittunetic, logical rule and for- mat which cannot embody the creators＇unique personalities. These contents might be protected in practice simply because people are not aware of the fact that they are generated by artificial intelligence. Such a problem is produced by the rules of evidence, which does not indicate that the copyright law changes to protect the content generated by artificial intelligence.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第5期148-155,共8页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目(14ZDC020)"互联网领域知识产权重大立法问题研究"
关键词
独创性
人工智能
机器学习
originality
artificial intelligence
machine learning
