期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

50MDB试验工况下WorldSID假人和ES2假人伤害对比 被引量：2

Contrast of Dummy Injury of WorldSID and ES2 in 50MDB Side Impact
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 World SID假人由于其更出色的生物仿真性,将在未来法规和评价试验中逐渐取代ES2假人。在2018版C-NCAP侧面碰撞试验工况下,用同一车型分别进行了World SID假人和ES2假人的碰撞试验,详细对比了两种假人的各部位伤害差异,并分析找到了影响其差异的具体原因。为未来2018版C-NCAP侧面试验假人的伤害优化提供参考。 Dummy of side impact will be changed from ES2 to WorldSID in the future regula- tions and standards, due to its much more excellent Bio - simulation. This article compared the dummy injury of WorldSID and ES2 in 50MDB test, and the test conditions are according to C - NCAP 2018. The dummy injury of different parts is compared, and the influence factors are found. Reference IS provided for dummy injury optimization of future C- NCAP 2018 side impact.
作者 苏国峰 杜亮 张绍卫 黄江寅
机构地区 一汽轿车股份有限公司 上海东方久乐汽车安全气囊有限公司
出处 《上海汽车》 2017年第10期57-62,共6页 Shanghai Auto
关键词 50MDB World SID 假人 ES2 碰撞试验
分类号 U467.14 [机械工程—车辆工程]
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1First Technology Safety Systems, Inc. WorldSID 50 th Percentile Dummy Users Manual Revision A, 2007.7.
  • 2S. Moss S., Wang Z., Salloum M., et al. Anthropome- try for WorldSID , a world-harmonized midsize male side impact crash dummy[R]. First Technology Safety Sys- tems, Plymouth, MI(US), 2000.
  • 3Iwata K., Tatsu K., Saeki H., et al. Comparison of dummy kinematics and injury response between World- SID and ES-2 in side impact [J]. SAE International Jour- nalofTran~portation Safety, 2013, 1 (1) : 192-199.
  • 4Rhule H., Moorhouse K., Dormelly B., et al. Com- parison of WorldSID and ES-2 re Biofidelity Using an Updated Biofidelity Ranking System [C]. Proceedings of the 21th Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference, 2009.
  • 5Scherer R., Bortenschlager K., Akiyama A., et al. WorldSID production dummy biomechanical re- sponses [C]. Proceedings of the 21 th Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference, 2009.
  • 6Trosseille X., Petitjean A. Sensitivity of the WorldSID 50th and ES-2 re thoraces to loading configurationEJ]. STAPP Car Crash Journal, 2010 (54) : 259-287.
  • 7Damm R., Schnottale B., Lorenz B. Evaluation of the biofidelity of the WorldSID and the ES-2 on the basis of PMHS data[C]. Proceedings of the International Con- ference of the Biomechanics of lmpact, 2006 (9) : 225- 237.
  • 8Hynd D., Carrol J., Been B., et al. Evaluation of the shoulder thorax and abdomen of the WorldSID pre-production aide impact dummy [R]. Research Laboratory Published Project Report, 2004.
  • 9ISO/TC22/SC12/WG5/WorldSID Task group Biofidelity ranking comparison WorldSID vs. ES-2 re. 2008. Techni- cal Document TGN538.
  • 10Ruhle H., Moorhouse K., Donnelly B., et al. Com- parison of WorldSID and ES-2 re biofidelity using an up- dated biofidelity ranking system [C]. Proceedings of the 21 th Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference, 2009.

共引文献10

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

上海汽车
2017年 第10期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部