摘要
目的在小儿包皮手术中分析比较应用包皮环切缝合器和传统包皮环切术治疗的效果。方法选取2015年1月~2016年7月在医院接受包皮手术的90例包茎或包皮过长小儿作为研究对象,根据手术方式进行分组,其中45例患儿应用传统包皮环切术治疗,命名为传统组,另外45例患儿应用包皮环切缝合器进行手术治疗,命名为研究组,比较两组患者手术治疗效果。结果研究组患者手术时间、伤口愈合所需时间均明显比传统组要短,患者术中出血量、术后VAS评分均低于传统组,并发症总发生率明显低于传统组。结论在小儿包皮手术中应用包皮环切吻合器治疗,疗效确切,值得临床推广。
Objective To analyze the effect of circumcision and conventional circumcision in pediatrie circumcision. Methods 90 cases of phimosis or prepuce from January 2015 to July 2016 in the hospital were selected. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical procedure. Among them, 45 cases in tradition group were treated with traditional circumcision, 45 cases in study group were treated with circumcision for surgical. The surgical treatment of the two groups were compared. Results The time of operation and the time of wound healing in the study group were significantly shorter than in the traditional group. The intraoperative blood loss and postoperative VAS score were lower than those of the traditional group. The overall incidence of complications of the study group was significantly lower than that of the traditional group. Conclusion The application of circumcision in pediatric circumcision is effective and worthy of clinical application.
出处
《中国医药科学》
2017年第18期204-206,共3页
China Medicine And Pharmacy
