摘要
针对儒学的现代价值问题,邓曦泽作了可称之为"竞争主义"的新批判。邓氏认为,这种批判的特色不在于具体结论,而在于其整个批判性论证所依赖的与众不同的方法论。但经过考察,可知邓氏所谓的方法论批判,恰恰迷失在方法论上,具体表现为他在立场与方法、好坏与进退、普适性与有效性、事实与逻辑、中西古今的对接等诸关系上的混淆。由此,其批判的合法性与结论的有效性就值得怀疑了。
In redefining the modern value of Confucianism, Deng Xize offers a new perspective of what can be called Competition Doctrine. A unique feature of this criticism, in his view, is the different methodology on which his whole argument is depended. But by analyzing his argument, we see that he has lost himself in the methodology, confusing the following relations of position and method, universality and effectiveness, logic and fact, the ancient and the modern, and what is Chinese and what is Western, etc..From this we know his whole criticism is doubtful.
出处
《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第5期71-77,共7页
Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基金
中国博士后第56批面上项目资助"清代汉宋关系的解释学研究"(2014M560302)
关键词
儒学
现代价值
方法论
竞争主义
Confucianism
modern value
methodology
competition doctrine
