期刊文献+

调解前置:多元化纠纷解决机制的优化路径选择 被引量:13

Intercession Prepositional Procedure:an Optimal Path for the Multiple Dispute Resolution System
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以法院为主导、社会各方力量参与的多元化纠纷解决机制强调充分发挥社会解决纠纷矛盾的力量,就必然要求进一步发挥调解的作用,将更多来自社会的矛盾在社会中得到解决。我国民事诉讼中的调解制度在民事纠纷的解决上发挥了重要作用,也在开庭前有效化解了一部分矛盾,但主要的调解工作依然是由人民法院成立专门的调解部门去进行,无形中也加重了地方法院的工作压力。而调解前置程序不仅可以充分发挥调解的解纷作用,还能有效减轻法院的案件压力、减少当事人的诉讼成本、促进民间调解机构的发展,也有利于增强法院的权威性。因此,我国有必要逐步建立起真正的调解前置程序,由法律对调解前置程序的受案范围、调解机构与调解人员的资质认定及调解协议的结果与效力方面均作出明确的规定,以使其具有可操作性。 The multiple dispute resolution system dominated by the court and participated by all parties in society,emphasizes social entities and people to resolve disputes.The mediation system in Chinese Civil Procedural Law has played an important role in civil disputes resolution in China,and it actually resolved some of the disputes before the court session.However,the main mediation work is still carried out by the people’s courts to set up a special mediation department,which virtually increased the pressure on the work of the local courts.The intercession prepositional procedure not only can give full play to resolve dispute mediation,but also can effectively reduce the pressure of court cases,reduce litigation cost of investment by the parties,and promote the development of civil mediation system,enhance the authority of the court.Therefore,it is necessary for China to gradually establish the intercession prepositional procedure defining the scope of accepting cases,conciliation service,qualification of mediation personnel,and the result of the settlement agreement of the procedure to make it operable.
机构地区 延边大学法学院
出处 《延边大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2017年第5期78-84,共7页 Journal of Yanbian University:Social Science Edition
关键词 多元化纠纷解决机制 调解前置 民事诉讼 The multiple dispute resolution system intercession prepositional procedure Civil Procedural Law
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献79

  • 1刘敏.论传统调解制度及其创造性转化—— 一种法文化学分析[J].社会科学研究,1999(1):57-62. 被引量:43
  • 2马作武.古代息讼之术探讨[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版),1998,52(2):47-51. 被引量:58
  • 3费孝通.乡土中国[M].上海:上海三联书店,1991..
  • 4.海瑞集[M].北京:中华书局,1962..
  • 5瞿同祖.中国法律与中国社会[M].香港:龙门书店,1967.73-75.
  • 6史记.五帝本纪[M].
  • 7史记.周本纪[M].
  • 8礼记.礼运[M].
  • 9Albert H.Y. Chen. Toward a Legal Enlightenment: Discussions in Contemporary China on the Rule of Law[J]. UCLA Pacific Basic Law Journal 17.1999:125.
  • 10Michael Palmer and Simon Roberts. Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision Making[M]. London: Butterworths, 1998.

共引文献72

同被引文献128

引证文献13

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部