期刊文献+

自制可视穿刺针式肾镜结合输尿管通道鞘治疗肾结石 被引量:6

Self-made optical puncture needle combined with ureteral access sheath for renal calculi treatment
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的评价自制可视穿刺针结合输尿管通道鞘治疗肾结石的临床意义。方法回顾性分析2016年6月至2017年2月8例用自制可视穿刺针结合输尿管通道鞘治疗肾结石患者的临床资料。结果 8例均留置输尿管通道鞘和穿刺成功。除1例因结石移位需输尿管软镜辅助治疗外,均成功直视下碎石。结石大小为(21.9±7.3)mm、手术时间(43.6±13.6)min、术后第1天疼痛VAS评分(2.8±1.3)分、术后血红蛋白减少7.0 g/L[(143.1±12.2)g/L vs.(136.1±10.5)g/L,P>0.05]、住院时间(3.1±1.0)d。无输血患者。术后1个月无石率为87.5%(7/8),1例残留结石直径约3 mm,术后随访3个月后结石消失,术后3个月无石率为100%(8/8)。结论自制可视穿刺针结合输尿管通道鞘治疗肾结石是可行的,有利于提高术后无石率,减少PCNL相关并发症。 Objective To evaluate the clinical value of a new optic puncture needle designed by our department for renal calculi treatment. Methods There were 8 patients undergoing micro-PCNL with the new device from June 2016 to February 2017. Values of basic demographic data, operation time, pain score, drop in hemoglobin and complications were recorded. Results The mean stone size, operation time, pain score, drop in hemoglobin, and in-hospital time was (21.9 ±7.3) mm, (43.6 ±13.6) min, 2.8 ± 1.3, 7.0 g/LE ( 133.2±10.3 g/L vs. ( 123.2 ± 13.9) g/L, P 〉 0.05] and (3.1 ± 1.0)d, respectively. No patient required blood transfusion. Stone-free rate at 1 and 3 months post-operation were 87.5% (7/8) and 100 % (8/8), respectively. One suffered urinary tract infections ( Clavien I ) and was treated with antibiotics. There were no major complications. Conclusion The new device for treatment of renal calculi is feasible and effective.
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第17期2896-2899,共4页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 可视穿刺针 输尿管通道鞘 肾结石 经皮肾镜取石术 斜仰卧截石位 opticalpuncture needle ureteral access sheath renal calculi percutaneous nephrolithotripsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献29

  • 1周祥福,高新,温机灵,肖翠兰,温晓飞,杨波,陆佳荪,陈兴屹,孙颖浩.平卧位微穿刺造瘘经皮肾镜碎石取石术56例报告[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(11):728-730. 被引量:56
  • 2Long C J, Weiss, DA, Kolon TF, et al. Pediatric calyceal diverticulum treatment: An experience with endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches [J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2015,11 : 172. el-6. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jpurol. 2015.04. 013.
  • 3Sejiny M, A1-Qahtani S, Elhaous A, et at. Efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser in the management of stone- bearing caliceal diverticula [ J ] . J Endourol, 2010, 4 : 961- 967. DOI: 10. 1089/end. 2009. 0437.
  • 4Bas O, Ozyuvali E, Aydogmus Y, et al. Management of calyceal diverticular calculi : a comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy [ J ] . Urolithiasis, 2015,43 : 155- 161. DOI: 10. 1007/s00240-014-0725-5.
  • 5Chong TW, Bui MH, Fuehs GJ. Calyeeal diverticula. Ureteroscopie management[ J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2000,27 : 647 -654.
  • 6Landry JL, Colombel M, Rouviere O, et al. Long term results of percutaneous treatment of ealieeal diverticular calculi [ J ]. Eur Urol, 2002,41:474-477.
  • 7Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2004,240 : 205- 213.
  • 8Auge BK, Munver R, Kourambas J, et al. Endoscopic management of symptomatic caliceal diverticula: retrospective comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and ureteroscopy [ J ]. J Endourol, 2002,16:557-563.
  • 9Canales B, Monga M. Surgical management of the calyceal diverticulum [ J ]. Curr Opin Urol, 2003,13:255-260.
  • 10Gross A J, Herrmann TR. Management of stones in calyceal diverticulum [J]. Curt Opin Urol, 2007,17 : 136-140.

共引文献32

同被引文献58

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部