期刊文献+

腰椎CT值与DXA在羊腰椎骨密度测量中的准确性比较 被引量:2

Comparison of Hounsfield unit and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in measurement of bone mineral density in lumbar spine
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的以羊椎体骨的灰重密度为标准,比较腰椎CT值与双能X线骨密度仪(dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry,DXA)对椎体骨密度测量的准确性,探讨腰椎CT值对骨密度的测量价值。方法取42节羊腰椎椎体,去除周围软组织及附件,分别进行CT平扫、DXA检查以测量各椎体骨密度,然后将椎体煅烧得到灰重密度值。首先对腰椎CT值测量方法进行可靠性分析,然后对比分析两种影像学方法所测量骨密度与灰重密度的相关性。结果腰椎CT值测量方法的组内相关系数是0.961,组间相关系数是0.975。腰椎CT值为(434.26±63.38),DXA所测骨密度为(0.65±0.06)g/cm^2,灰重密度为(0.29±0.05)g/cm^3。腰椎CT值、DXA测量结果与灰重密度的相关系数分别是0.855、0.905,两者无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论腰椎CT值测量与DXA测量具有较高的一致性和良好的可重复性。与DXA一样,腰椎CT值可准确判断腰椎椎体骨密度高低,可作为DXA的替代方法。 Objective To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Hounsfield units and DXA in measurement of lumbar bone mineral density with ash density as reference. Methods A total of 42 sheep lumbar vertebras without posterior element and soft tissue were scanned by CT and DXA. Then lumbar vertebras were incinerated to calculate the ash density of individual vertebrae. Correlation between Hounsfield unit and DXA were analyzed following the reliability analysis of Hounsfield unit measurement.Results The interclass and intraclass correlation coefficients of Hounsfield units were 0.961 and 0.975, respectively. Hounsfield unit value was(434.26±63.38). Bone mineral density measured by DXA was(0.65±0.06)g/cm2. Ash density was(0.29±0.05) g/cm3. The correlation coefficients between Hounsfield unit and ash density, DXA and ash density were 0.855 and 0.905, respectively. Difference between the two correlation coefficients was not significant(P〉0.05). Conclusion Hounsfield unit was a reliable measurement. Measurement of Hounsfield unit, accurately as DXA, may be an alternative of DXA in clinical practice.
作者 米自友
出处 《社区医学杂志》 2017年第15期66-68,共3页 Journal Of Community Medicine
关键词 骨密度 腰椎CT 双能X线骨密度仪 Lumbar bone mineral density Lumbar vertebra CT DXA Sheep
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献32

  • 1刘忠厚,杨定焯,朱汉民,王洪复,张柳,唐海,赵燕玲.中国人原发性骨质疏松症诊断标准(试行)[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,1999,5(1):1-3. 被引量:248
  • 2吴胜勇,杨立,祁吉,王斌,温连庆,李景学.骨质疏松老年妇女腰椎骨密度及结构的多层螺旋CT研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(11):1165-1170. 被引量:28
  • 3Lang TF, Keyak JH, Heitz MW, et al. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur : precision and relation to bone strength. Bone, 1997, 21:101-108.
  • 4Lang T, LeBlanc A, Evans H, et al. Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long-duration spaceflight J Bone Miner Res, 2004, 19:1006-1012.
  • 5Lian KC, Lang TF, Keyak JH, et al. Differences in hip quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements of bone mineral density and bone strength between glucocorticoid-treated and glucocorticoid-naive postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int, 2005, 16:642-650.
  • 6Li WS, Saeed I, Lang T. Automated registration of hip and spine for longitudinal QCT studies: integration with 3D densitometric and structural analysis. Bone, 2006, 38:273 -279.
  • 7Hoaglund FT, Low WD. Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese. Clin Orthop, 1980, 152:10-16.
  • 8Cheng XG, Nicholson PH, Boonen S, et al. Effects of anteversion on femoral bone mineral density and geometry measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cadaver study. Bone, 1997, 21: 113-117.
  • 9Gob JCH, Low SL, Bose K. Effect of femoral rotation on bone mineral density measurements with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int, 1995, 57:340-343.
  • 10Hayes WC, Myers ER. Biomechanical considerations of hip and spine fractures in osteoporotic bone. Instr Course Lect, 1997, 46: 431-438.

共引文献25

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部