期刊文献+

西妥昔单抗与贝伐单抗分别联合FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的对比研究 被引量:8

Comparison of the efficacy of cetuximab and bevacizumab respectively combined with FOLFOX4 regimen in treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:比较西妥昔单抗与贝伐单抗分别联合FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的临床疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析2008年9月至2012年9月经组织病理学证实的晚期结直肠癌患者49例,西妥昔单抗联合FOLFOX4方案组26例,贝伐单抗联合FOLFOX4方案组23例。两组患者在性别、年龄、病理类型、分期等方面大致平衡。观察各组临床疗效和治疗期间毒副反应。结果:贝伐单抗联合FOLFOX4方案治疗转移性结直肠癌有效率低于西妥昔单抗联合FOLFOX4方案(P<0.01)。两组间毒副反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:西妥昔单抗联合化疗对K-Ras基因为野生型的转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效优于贝伐单抗,且耐受性好。 Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of cetuximab and bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX4 regimen in treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: From September 2008 to September 2012 retrospective analysis was performed on 49 cases with advanced colorectal cancer. Among the 49 patients,26 cases re-ceived cetuximab combined with FOLFOX4 regimen and 23 cases received and bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX4 regimen therapy. There were all balanced between the two groups in terms of sex, age, pathology and staging in patient characteristics. The efficacy and toxicity of the two groups were observed. Results: In the advanced colorectal patients, the efficieng of bevacizumab with FOLFOX4 treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer was lower than cetuximab com-bined with FOLFOX4(P 〈0.01). There was no significant difference on adverse between the two groups(P 〉0.05). Conclusion: Cetuximab combined with FOLFOX4 regimen for patients with advanced colorectal cancer was effective, and the tolerance was better.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2017年第17期2781-2784,共4页 Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词 西妥昔单抗 贝伐单抗 FOLFOX4方案 晚期结直肠癌 cetuximab, bevacizumab, F0 LF0X4 regimen, advanced colorectal cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献7

  • 1钱军,秦叔逵.以表皮生长因子受体为靶点的抗癌新药——C225[J].中国实用内科杂志,2005,25(8):676-679. 被引量:14
  • 2徐建明,张华.西妥昔单抗单药或与伊立替康联合治疗伊立替康耐药的转移性结直肠癌[J].循证医学,2006,6(5):274-276. 被引量:14
  • 3Cunningham D, Hurnblet Y, Siena S, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and eetuximab plus irinotecan in irinoteean - refaetory metastatic eolorectal cancer[ J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 351:337 -345.
  • 4Abubakr Y, Eng C, Pautret V, et al. Cetuxinab plus irinotecan for matastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) : safety anlysis of 800 patients in randomized phase III trial ( EPIC ) [ C ]. Atlanta, USA 42nd ASCO Annual Meeting, 2006 :,3556.
  • 5Karapetis CS, Khambata - Ford S, Jonker DJ, et al. K - ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer [ J ]. N Engl J Med,2008,359 ( 17 ) : 1757 - 1765.
  • 6Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Hartmann JT, et al. K - ras status and efficacy of first - line treatment of patients with metastatic colo- rectal cancer (mCRC) with or without cetuximab :The OPUS experience [ J ]. J Clin Oncol,2008,26 : a4000.
  • 7钱军,李慧,秦叔逵.EGFRI皮肤毒性的发生机制和处理策略[J].现代肿瘤医学,2009,17(6):1186-1191. 被引量:17

共引文献3

同被引文献73

引证文献8

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部