摘要
目的:探讨关于Lisfranc损伤的分型以及不同治疗方式的治疗效果。方法:收集2014年1月至2016年1月收治的Lisfranc损伤患者30例,采用切开复位螺钉内固定法治疗10例,闭合复位外固定法治疗10例,复位克氏针内固定法治疗10例,对不同治疗方式的疗效进行分析。结果:经切开复位螺钉内固定治疗患者的有效率为90.0%(9/10),闭合复位外固定治疗患者为20.0%(2/10),复位克氏针内固定治疗为60.0%(6/10),组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在Lisfranc损伤的早期治疗中,采用切开复位螺钉内固定法治疗能有效提高治疗效果,值得在临床应用。
Objective：To explore the classification of Lisfranc injury and the clinical treatment effect of different treatment methods. Methods：Thirty cases of Lisfranc injury were selected in the hospital from January 2014 to January 2016, 10 cases were treated by the open reduction and internal fixation, 10 cases by the closed reduction and external fixation, and 10 cases by open reduction and Kirchner＇s pin internal fixation. The effects of different treatment methods were analyzed. Results：The effective rate of open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of patients was 90%（9/10）, the effective rate of closed reduction and external fixation in the treatment of patients was 20%（2/10）, the effective rate of the reduction of Kirschner pin internal fixation was 60%（6/10）, and the differences among the groups were statistically significant（P0.05）. Conclusion：In the early treatment of Lisfranc injury, open reduction and internal fixation treatment can effectively improve the treatment effect, which is worthy of clinical application.
出处
《上海医药》
CAS
2017年第14期26-28,共3页
Shanghai Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal
