摘要
《棣垞集》有清刻本行世,其稿本亦保存完好。稿本与刻本在诗文数量、文词字句上均存在较大差异。刻本诗文系从稿本中选刻,所收诗文数量不及稿本一半,未能反映《棣垞集》全貌。在编刻过程中,编刻者对稿本有所选择、删削和修改,不仅造成文字词句上的出入,而且反映出编刻者与作者在审度标准上的差异。对稿本与刻本的比较研究,可见稿本具有一定的文物价值和文献价值。
The block-printed edition of Di Cha Ji is prevalent nowadays and its manuscript is also well preserved.But compared with the manuscript,there is a huge difference in the number of poems and articles and the words in the block-printed edition.The quantity of poems and articles in the block-printed edition,chosen from the manuscript,are less than half the manuscript.Therefore,the block-printed edition does not provide the full picture of Di Cha Ji.In the editing process,the compiler selected,deleted and revised the manuscript of Di Cha Ji,which causes the discrepancies between the two versions,and reflects the different editing criterion between the compiler and the writer.By comparison,the research indicates the manuscript of Di Cha Ji is of cultural relic value and literature value.
出处
《图书馆论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第8期135-142,共8页
Library Tribune
基金
2016年度<广州大典>与广州历史文化研究资助专项重点课题"<棣垞集全稿>整理与研究"(课题编号:2016GZZ07)研究成果
关键词
朱启连
棣垞集
稿本
刻本
Zhu Qilian
Di Cha Ji
manuscript
block-printed edition
