摘要
凯尔森试图构建一种剔除了政治意识形态和自然因素的法律科学,可以用两组关键词来概括其纯粹法理论:科学、纯粹、客观、一元和现实;社会技术、强制秩序、制裁、不法行为、规范、义务和权利。凯尔森认为法律权利是法律规范对一个由规范所指定的人,即可能的原告的关系。在凯尔森的法律理论中,义务先于权利,从主要规范到法律权利的逻辑顺序是:从主要规范到次要规范,从次要规范到义务,从义务再到权利。凯尔森论述了法律权利的存在方式、主体、作用和类别。凯尔森对法律权利的认识,既有真知灼见,也存在着一定的局限,对纯粹法理论及其权利概念进行反思,能够使我们对法律权利和法律科学的认识变得更加全面。
Kelsen tries to construct a kind of legal science without political ideology and natural factor. We can sum up his pure law theory with two groups of key words ： scientific, pure, objective, monism and reality; social technology, forced order, punishment, wrongdoing, norm, obligation and fight. Kelsen thinks that legal fight is the relation of the legal fight with a person specified by the norm, maybe the plaintiff. In kelsen＇ s legal theory, obligation is before right. The logical order from the main norm to legal fight is ： main norm, secondary norm, obligation, right. Kelsen expounds the existing way, subjective body, function and kinds of the legal right. There are not only great insights but also some limitations in kelsen＇ theory. The reflection on the pure law theory and its con- cept of fight will make our awareness on legal fight and legal science more comprehensive.
出处
《太原学院学报（社会科学版）》
2017年第2期39-45,共7页
Journal of Taiyuan University(Social Science Edition)
