摘要
目的探析PCT(血清降钙素原)对细菌感染性疾病的作用。方法 2015年12月—2016年12月期间该院共收治57例细菌感染患者,将其作为该次研究的观察组;另选同期所收治的57例非细菌感染患者为该次研究的对照组。对比其C反应蛋白(CRP)、以及PCT(血清降钙素原)检测结果。结果观察组患者PCT阳性检出率为91.23%;CRP检测阳性检出率为82.46%;两项结果相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组患者PCT阳性检出率为21.05%;CRP阳性检出率为70.18%;两项结果相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在PCT检测中,对照组与观察组在阳性检出率上差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在CRP检测中,对照组与观察组在阳性检出率上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 PCT检测以及CRP检测均能够为细菌感染性疾病的确诊提供一定的临床依据,但就特异性而言,CRP检测远不如PCT检测。
Objective To investigate the effect of PCT （serum procalcitonin） on bacterial infectious diseases. Methods From December 2015 to December 2016, 57 patients with bacterial infection were selected as the observation group of this study. 57 patients with non-bacterial infection were treated with the same period were selected as the control group. Compared with its C-reactive protein （CRP）, and PCT （serum procalcitonin） test results. Results The positive rate of PCT detection was 91.23% in the observation group and 82.46% in the CRP group. The difference was not statistically significant （P〉 0.05）. The positive rate of PCT detection was 21.05% in the control group and 70.18% in the CRP group. The difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. There was no significant difference in positive detection rate between the control group and the observation group （P〈0.05）. There was no significant difference in the positive rate of detection between the control group and the observation group （P〉0.05）. Conclusion PCT test and CRP test can provide some clinical basis for the diag-nosis of bacterial infectious diseases, but in particular, CRP detection is far less than PCT test.
出处
《中外医疗》
2017年第13期44-45,48,共3页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
