摘要
涉外民事管辖权积极冲突的问题造成了国际民事诉讼领域的诸多困境,各国分别采用了先系属优先原则、不方便法院原则、禁诉令等多种方法来协调这一冲突。但是以上方法大多注重于同时进行的平行诉讼,未能解决生效判决作出后的重复诉讼问题。相对而言,已有生效判决的民事争议更要避免重复起诉,以减少司法资源的浪费。从既判力角度看,可以通过"区间划分"来审视整个诉讼程序中不同阶段的既判力对他国司法管辖权的影响,进而以民事判决的既判力理论为民事管辖权冲突提供协调思路。尤其是在"既判力标准时"和"判决得到承认"两个时间节点之间,可以以既判力的效力缓和管辖权冲突。
The positive conflict of jurisdiction of transnational civil litigation has caused many difficulties in the field of international civil litigation. Countries have adopted several ways to coordi-nate this conflict, such as principle of lis a l ib i p e n d e n s , forum non convenience and anti-suit injunc-tions. However, the above methods mainly focused on parallel litigation, which are unable to solve problems resulted of repeated suit after an effective judgment. Relatively speaking, the civil dis-putes ,which the judgment has already come into effect, need to avoid repeated prosecution, so as to reduce the waste of judicial resources. From the perspective of res j u d i c a t a , we could reassess its im-pact on other countries, jurisdiction through Interval Partition among the whole procedure at different stages, and the theory of res ju d i c a ta in civil judgment provides ideas for coordinating civil jurisdic-tion conflicts. Especially during the period between the time of criterion and the time when the judg-ment be recognized, the effectiveness of res ju d i c a ta may ease the necessity of exercising jurisdic-tion.
出处
《时代法学》
2017年第3期115-121,共7页
Presentday Law Science
基金
国家社科基金重大项目<中国涉外民事关系法体系完善研究>(批准号:14ZDC032)的阶段性成果
关键词
管辖权积极冲突
既判力
标准时
重复诉讼
positive conflicts of the jurisdiction
res judicata
the time of creterion
repeatedsuits
