期刊文献+

基于混合选择模型的汽车共享选择行为研究 被引量:25

Travelers' Choice Behavior of Car Sharing Based on Hybrid Choice Model
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了深入分析出行者的汽车共享选择行为,首先以技术接受模型和计划行为理论为框架,将对汽车共享选择行为具有影响的心理因素整合到传统的离散选择模型之中,形成混合选择模型.然后,基于南京市的实证调查数据,运用混合选择模型对出行者的汽车共享选择行为进行研究.结果表明,出行者对于汽车共享的感知有用性、感知易用性、行为态度、知觉行为控制等心理态度潜变量对其选择行为产生显著的正向影响,混合选择模型比传统不带潜变量MNL模型对实证数据具有更高的拟合度. In order to analyze travelers’ choice behavior of car sharing,this paper constructs a hybrid choice model for the choice behavior of car sharing,according to the expanded theory of planned behavior and technology acceptance model with variety of psychological factors which respect to the choice behavior of car sharing.Based on the empirical survey data of Nanjing in China,the integrated hybrid choice model is utilized to estimate these relationships.The results show that the psychological latent variables have significant positive impact on the choice behavior of car sharing,such as perceived usefulness,perceived ease of use,attitude and perception behavioral control.The outcome of estimation of HCM has a higher degree of fitting than the traditional MNL without latent variables.
作者 鞠鹏 周晶 徐红利 张俊婷 JU Peng ZHOU Jing XU Hong-li ZHANG Jun-ting(School of Management and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China)
出处 《交通运输系统工程与信息》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第2期7-13,共7页 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(71371094 71471084)~~
关键词 交通工程 出行方式选择 混合选择模型 汽车共享 潜变量 traffic engineering travel mode choice hybrid choice model car sharing latent variable
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1莫泰基.香港贫困与社会保障[M].香港:中华书局,1993.
  • 2Ben-Akiva M, de Palma A, Kanaroglou P. Dynamic model of peak period traffic congestion with elastic arrival rates [J]. Transportation Science, 1986,20( 3 ) : 164-181.
  • 3Central Transportation Planning. Transfer penalties in urban mode choice modeling (travel model improvement program) [ M]. Washington D C:Travel Model Improvement Program, 1997:30-45.
  • 4Cherchi E, de D Ortt-zar J. Mixed RP/SP models incorporating interaction effects [ J ]. Transportation, 2002,29 (4) : 371-395.
  • 5Palma A, Rochat D. Mode choice for trips to work in Geneva:an empirical analysis [ J ]. Journal of Transport Geo- graphy,2000,8( 1 ) :43-51.
  • 6Yanez M F, Raveau S, de D Ortuzar J. Inclusion of latent variables in mixed Logit models:modeling and forecasting [ J ]. Transportation Research Part A : Policy and Practice, 2010,44(9) :744-753.
  • 7Golob T F. Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research [ J ]. Transportation Research Part B : Methodological ,2003,37 ( 1 ) : 1-25.
  • 8周雪梅,张显尊,杨晓光,劳云腾.基于交通方式选择的公交出行需求预测[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(12):1627-1631. 被引量:19
  • 9Srinivasan S, Roger P. Travel behavior of low-income residents: Studying two contrasting locations in the city of Chennai, India[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2005(13): 265-274.
  • 10Salon D, Gulyani S. Mobility, poverty, and gender: Travel‘choices’of slum residents in Nairobi, Kenya[J]. Transport Reviews, 2010(30): 641-657.

共引文献71

同被引文献128

引证文献25

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部