摘要
苏轼论体古文可分为三类:"进策"、"进论"与论古之作。"进策"及"进论"中的人物论采色绚烂,高下抑扬,在艺术上追求新颖、巧妙,有意而为的成分居多;论古之作平淡、自然,文若泉水涌地而出,有随笔写出、不待安排而自然超妙者。两者的不同,不但表现在文章结构、修辞手段、艺术风貌上,甚至连文章的长短、达意的曲直、言说的详略,都有区别。如何评论这两类各具审美特征的论体古文,我们应注意苏轼本人的看法,即他说的"凡文字,少小时须气象峥嵘,采色绚烂,渐老渐熟,乃造平淡。其实不是平淡,绚烂之极也"。
In this paper, writing art and stylistic features of three essay-styled classical Chinese of Su Shi are discussed in detail. As far as art style is concerned, he displayed his pursuit of novelty and craftiness with excellent and intentional expression in Jin Ce （advisory essay） and Jin Lun （character description） ; while smooth and natural language to illustrate his viewpoints in es- says of ancient works. The differences lie in all levels of essays, including structures, figures of speech, art presentation, as well as length, loyalty, complexity, etc. Su Shi＇s viewpoints should be taken consideration when comparing these two essay- styled classical Chinese with aesthetic features： outstanding and colorful language is likely to be adopted when young while com- mon and natural language when getting old, or rather, extremely colorful.
出处
《杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第2期79-87,共9页
Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词
苏轼
论体古文
进策
进论(人物论)
论古之作
Su Shi
essay-styled classical Chinese
Jin Ce （advisory essay）
Jin Lun （character description）
essay on ancient works
