摘要
目的:探讨中医物理治疗PCOS患者的临床疗效。方法:将294例接受促排卵治疗的PCOS患者根据用药方案分为A(克罗米芬组)、B(来曲唑组)、C(来曲唑+中医治疗组)三组,比较各组患者的年龄、不孕年限、体重指数、基础窦卵数,GN天数,HCG日血LH、E2、P水平,排卵率及妊娠结局。结果:除E2外,三组患者年龄、不孕年限、体重指数、基础窦卵数,GN天数,HCG日血LH、E2、P水平等一般资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。C组患者子宫内膜最厚,来曲唑组(B组)次之,A组最薄,其中,A组与C组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组排卵率最高,C组次之,B组最低,其中A组与B组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。C组最终妊娠率最高,A组最低,A组与C组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:中医物理治疗可改善PCOS患者的促排卵结局,提高妊娠率,值得临床推广应用。
Objective ： To investigate the clinical efficacy of physical therapy in patients with PCOS. Methods. 294 cases were divid- ed into A,B. C three groups, compared their age, infertility duration, body mass index, the basic number of antral follicles, GN days, HCG, blood LH, E2 , P level. The ovulation rate and pregnancy outcome. Results： There were no significant differences be tween the three groups in terms of age, duration of infertility, body mass index, number of LH, GN, P, HCG, Ez ,etc.. The thickness of endometrium, Chinese medicine treatment group （group C） the most thick letrozole group （B group） of CC group （group A） of the thin, among them, there was a significant difference between A group and C group （P〈0.05）, I had no significant differ ence. The ovulation rate was highest in A group, C group, B group is the lowest, the A group compared with B group, the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）, but no statistical difference. The final pregnancy rate in the treatment group was the highest, the lowest in the A group, A group and C group was statistically significant （P〈0.05）, there was no statistical difference between the two groups, but the difference was significant. Conclusion ： physical therapy can improve the outcome of ovulation in patients with PCOS, which is worthy of further study.
出处
《亚太传统医药》
2017年第6期124-126,共3页
Asia-Pacific Traditional Medicine
关键词
PCOS
妊娠结局
中医物理治疗
PCOS
Pregnancy Outcome
Chinese Medicine Physical Therapy
