摘要
小额诉讼程序实施陷入困境的深层次原因在于一审裁判权威不足,从中暴露出民事诉讼轻视程序保障的一般问题,表现为立法上的重纠错、轻保障,司法实践中的重效率、轻保障,以及审判改革的审判权本位主义。要激活小额诉讼程序,树立一审裁判权威,需从根本上反思民事诉讼法律制度的价值取向,从立法到实践两个层面重视程序保障。约束审判权和保障当事人程序权利是正当程序这枚硬币的两面。正当程序的内在价值即程序正义主要是对审判行为提出的道德要求。程序简化主要是简化审判手续,不是克减当事人程序权利,且不能突破程序保障的最低要求。
The deep reason of the implements of small claim procedure is the inadequate of the first instance referee authority. The common problems of Civil lawsuit disdain procedure guarantee are exposed as legislatively valuing correction and neglecting guarantee,practically valuing efficiency and neglecting guarantee,and trial Sectionalism.In order to activate the small claim procedure and set up the first instance referee authority,the value orientation of civil lawsuit system must be thoroughly reflected,while the procedure guarantee must be legislatively and practically paid attention to.The restraint of judicial authority and the guarantee of procedure rights are the two sides of the coin of proper procedure. The inner value of the proper procedure is that procedure justices are the moral requirements of the trial action,while procedure simplification is not cutting down the procedure rights,but the minimum requirements of procedure gurantee.
作者
吴英姿
Wu Yingzi(School of Law, Nanning University, Nanning Jiangsu 210000)
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
2017年第2期1-9,共9页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
关键词
程序保障
一审裁判权威
程序简化
最低限度程序保障
procedure guarantee
first instance referee authority
procedure simplification
minimum procedure guarantee
