期刊文献+

腹腔镜下低位直肠癌改良Bacon术临床应用分析 被引量:9

Clinical analysis of improved Bacon laparoscopic surgery with low rectal surgery
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下低位直肠癌改良Bacon术的优势及临床应用前景。方法符合标准的低位直肠癌患者80例,将80例患者依手术方式分为改良Bacon术组和腹腔镜下双吻合器术组,每组各40例。比较两组患者住院时间、术后住院费用、短期并发症、控便能力及短期复发率。结果与双吻合器术组比较,改良Bacon术组住院费用降低,术后短期并发症发生率低,术后控便功能高,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者住院时间、术后短期复发率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与腹腔镜下双吻合器术比较,改良Bacon术术后住院费用低,短期并发症少,生活质量高,安全性好。 Objective To discuss advantages and clinical application of improved Bacon laparo-scopic surgery with low rectal surgery.Methods Selected of 80 patients with low rectal surgery were di-vided into improved Bacon surgery group(40 cases)and double-stapling surgery group(40 cases),used SPSS to analysis hospital stays,postoperative hospitalization costs,short-term complications,ability of defe-cation and short-term recurrence rate.Results Compared with the double-stapling surgery group,patients'hospital costs of improved Bacon surgery group reduced(P 〈0.05),short-term postoperative complication rate decreased(P 〈0.05)and ability of defecation increased (P 〈0.05).Ability of defecation and postop-erative short-term recurrence rate were no significant difference(P 〉0.05).Conclusion Compared with double-stapling surgery under laparoscopic,modified Bacon surgery had less postoperative hospitalization costs,less short-term complications small,better quality of life and more safety.
出处 《临床外科杂志》 2017年第1期67-69,共3页 Journal of Clinical Surgery
基金 湖北省卫计委科研基金资助项目(WJ2015MB272) 黄冈市科技计划资助项目(S2013-01-0130099)
关键词 腹腔镜 直肠癌 直肠低位前切除术 直肠改良Bacon术 laparoscopy colorectal cancer rectal low anterior resection rectal resection of improved Bacon
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1Clausen N, Wolloscheck T, Konerding MA. How to optimize autonomic nerve preservation in total mesorectal excision: clinical topography and morphology of pelvic nerves and fasciae. World J Surg, 2008,32 : 1768-1775.
  • 2Abel E3, Masterson TA, Warner iN, et al. Nerve-sparing prostatectomy and urinary function: a prospective analysis using validated quality-of-life measures. Urology, 2009,73:1336-1340.
  • 3Dursun P, Ayhan A, Kuscu E. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2009,70 : 195-205.
  • 4Heald RJ, Karanjia ND. Results of radical surgery for rectal cancer. World J Surg, 1992,16: 848-857.
  • 5Lin M, Chen W, Huang L, et al. The anatomy o1" lateral ligament of the rectum and its role in toral mesorec.tal excision. World J Surg, 2010,34: 594-598.
  • 6Lin M, Chen W, Huang L, et al. The anatomic basis of total mesorectaI excision. Am : Surg, 2011,2OI :537-543.
  • 7Bisset IP, Chau KY, Hill GL. Extrafascial excision of the rectum: surgical anatomy of the fascia propria. Dis Colon Rectum, 2000,43 : 903-910.
  • 8Sugihara K, Moriya Y, Akasu T, et al. Pelvic autonomic nerve preservation for patients with rectal carcinoma. Oncologic and functional outcome. Cancer, 1996,78 : 187 l- 1880.
  • 9Taguchi K, Tsukamoto T, Murakami G. Anatomical studies of the autonomic nervous system in the human pelvis by the whole-mount staining method: left-right communicating nerves between bilateral pelvic plexuses. J Urol, 1999,161:320-325.
  • 10Kihara K, de Groat WC. Sympathetie efferent pathways projecting bilaterally to the vas deferens in the rat. Anat Rec, 1997,248 : 291-299.

共引文献12

同被引文献91

引证文献9

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部