CAD/CAM高嵌体修复根管治疗后磨牙大面积缺损的临床研究被引量：81

The clinic outcome of CAD/CAM onlay in the restoration of molars with extensive defect after root canal treatment

导出

摘要目的:分析CAD/CAM高嵌体修复磨牙根管治疗后牙冠大面积缺损的疗效分析。方法:选择260颗牙体重度龋损累及牙髓的磨牙,经完善的根管治疗后采用CAD/CAM椅旁技术进行全瓷高嵌体修复。分别在修复后6、12、18个月进行随访,参考美国公共健康会(USPHS)标准对其临床效果进行观察。结果:在260颗患牙中,CAD/CAM高嵌体修复磨牙根管治疗后牙冠大面积缺损成功率为98%,其中3例发生修复体脱落,2例发生修复体折裂。结论:CAD/CAM高嵌体修复技术可以作为磨牙根管治疗后牙体大面积缺损修复的手段。 Objective： To observe the clinical efficacy of CAD/CAM all-ceramic onlay in the restoration of molars with extensive defect after root canal therapy （RCT）. Methods： 260 molars with extensive defect were restored by all-ceramic onlay after RCT. The pa- tients were followed up for 18 months. Tile restoration effects were assessed using USPHS criteria. Results： The success rate of CAD/ CAM all-ceramic onlay was 98%. Restoration exfoliation was found in 3 cases, fractured in 2 cases. Conclusion： CAD/CAM all-ce- ramic onlay can be applied in restoring extensive postenor tooth-defection after RCT.

作者于海悦麻丹丹林小育凌志婷吴补领 YU Haiyue MA Dandan LIN Xiaoyu LING Zhiting WU Buling.(510515 Guangzhou, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University · Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, China)

机构地区南方医科大学口腔医学院.南方医科大学南方医院口腔科

出处《实用口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期41-44,共4页 Journal of Practical Stomatology

基金国家自然科学基金青年项目(编号:81400495) 广东省自然科学基金博士启动项目(编号:2015A3030310101)

关键词根管治疗(RCT) 磨牙高嵌体牙体缺损 Root canal therapy（ RCT） Molar Onlay Tooth defect

分类号 R783.3 [医药卫生—口腔医学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献2

1解双丽.铸造钴铬合金嵌体与银汞充填治疗磨牙龋源性垂直性食物嵌塞的疗效对比[J].临床医学,2010,30(8):101-102. 被引量：4
2田宇,李娜,余擎,鲁红,张亚庆.牙体缺损修复中瓷嵌体应用[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2014,7(2):81-84. 被引量：22

二级参考文献20

1Dejak B,Mlotkowski A. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars[J].Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,2008,(02):131-140.
2Bergman MA. The clinical performance of ceramic inlays:a review[J].Australian Dental Journal,1999,(03):157-168.
3Otto T,Schneider D. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays:a case series[J].International Journal of Prosthodontics,2008,(01):53-59.
4Couegnat G,Fok SL,Cooper JE. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth[J].Dental Materials,2006,(01):3-12.
5M(o)llers K,Parkot D,Kirsten A. Influence of tooth mobility on critical stresses in all ceramic inlay retained fixed dental prostheses:a finite element study[J].Dental Materials,2012,(02):146-151.
6Gabbert O,Karatzogiannis E,Ohlmann B. Fracture load of tooth implant retained zirconia ceramic fixed dental prostheses:effect of span length and preparation design[J].Clinical Oral Implants Research,2012,(06):719-725.
7Dejak B,Mlotkowski A. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars[J].Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,2008,(02):131-140.
8Desai PD,Das UK. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite:an in vitro study[J].Indian Journal of Dental Research,2011,(06):877.
9Ban S,Anusavice K. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials[J].Journal of Dental Research,1990,(12):1791-1799.
10Lin CL,Chang YH,Lin YF. Combining structural-thermal coupled field FE analysis and the Taguchi method to evaluate the relative contributions of multi-factors in a premolar adhesive MOD restoration[J].Journal of Dentistry,2008,(08):626-636.