摘要
目的探讨微生物检验方法检验不同临床采样的标本的结果,尤其是在阳性率上的比较,进行研究分析。方法对照试验法,将2014年与2015年从1-12月全年的临床标本进行微生物检验,将2014年全年的临床标本微生物检验作为A组,2015年全年的临床标本微生物检验为B组,A、B两组全年的临床标本大致可分为,呼吸道标本、血培养标本、伤口分泌物标本以及痰标本、大便标本、尿液标本。进行两组结果阳性率的对照比较,总结结果及影响结果的因素。结果 A组微生物检验阳性率结果为呼吸道标本41.69%,血培养标本17.60%,伤口分泌物标本22.49%,痰标本17.83%,大便标本21.61%,尿液标本35.75%,B组结果分别为：32.22%、12.48%、18.00%、12.27%、19.93%、31.22%。两组阳性率比较差异存在统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论微生物检测能够为临床诊断提供重要的参考依据,同时也能反映当下流行疾病的情况。为了探讨微生物检测中存在的问题,实验发现两年不同临床标本阳性率的差异明显,寻找原因,制定相关的措施,为临床诊断疾病提供准确的参考价值。
Objective To investigate the results of microbiological examination in different clinical samples, especially in the comparison of positive rate, and to research and analyze the results. Methods The clinical specimens from 2014 to 2015 were given microbiological tests. The microbiological examination of clinical specimens for the whole year of 2014 was taken as group A. The microbiological examination of the clinical specimen of the year 2015 was taken as group B. The clinical specimens of group A and group B can be divided as respiratory specimens, blood culture specimens, wound secretions specimens and sputum specimens, stool specimens, urine specimens. The positive rate of the two groups were compared, the results and the factors affecting the results were concluded. Results The results of microbiological test in group A were respiratory specimens with 41.69%, blood culture specimens with 17.60%, wound secretions specimens with 22.49%, sputum specimens with 17.83%, stool specimens with 21.6% and urine specimens with 35.75% respectively. The results of group B were 32.22%, 12.48%, 18.00%, 12.27%, 19.93%, 31.22%. The positive rate of the two groups was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Microbiological testing can provide an important reference for clinical diagnosis, and reflect the current epidemic situation. In order to explore the problems of microbial detection, the experiment finds that the positive rate of different clinical samples was significantly different in two years. Finding the reason and formulating relevant measures are important to provide accurate reference value for clinical diagnosis of disease.
出处
《中国医药科学》
2016年第19期122-124,共3页
China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词
临床标本
微生物检验
阳性率
Clinical specimens
Microbiological examination
Positive rate
