期刊文献+

临床研究者伦理审查知识、态度、行为调查与分析 被引量:7

Survey and analysis of clinical researchers' Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) about ethical review
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 了解临床研究者对伦理审查的知识、态度、行为(KAP)及其相关性,为今后对临床研究者的伦理审查教育培训工作提供基础资料.方法 采用按职称分层随机抽样的方法,对北京市某三级甲等综合医院277名临床研究者进行问卷调查,利用SPSS 20软件进行统计分析.结果 临床研究者对伦理审查的知识均分为69.05,态度均分为80.86,行为均分为67.80;知识与态度的相关性为0.222,知识与行为的相关性为0.544,态度与行为的相关性为0.351,P值均小于0.05.结论 临床研究者伦理审查的知识水平偏低,学习行为有所欠缺,但是学习态度良好.可以在临床研究者学习态度良好的有利条件下,加强对临床研究者关于伦理审查知识的教育培训工作,提高临床研究者伦理知识素养,使医学研究健康有序发展. Objective To investigate and analyze clinical researchers' knowledge,attitude and practice (KAP) regarding ethical review and its correlation with KAP,which could provide foundation information for developing ethical review education programs for clinical researchers in future.Methods The random sampling method was used to stratify for different group by professional titles.Total 277 clinical researchers in a top class hospital in Beijing were investigated using self-developed questionnaire.The collected data was analyzed by SPSS software.Results The average scores of clinical researchers' knowledge,attitude and practice about ethical review are 69.05,80.86,and 67.80 respectively.The correlation coefficient of knowledge and attitudes is 0.222 (P<0.05),the correlation coefficient of knowledge and practice is 0.544 (P<0.05),and the correlation coefficient of practice and attitudes is 0.351 (P<0.05).Conclusions Clinical researchers' knowledge about ethical review were at a relatively low level.And their practice about ethical review were not good enough.But their attitude towards learning ethical review was relatively good.It has suggested that more education and training programs on ethical review should be implemented for clinical investigators to improve their ethical literacy.
作者 洪雪 江丽丽 张纯 刘晓光 Hong Xue Jiang Lili Zhang Chun Liu Xiaoguang(Science & Technol ogy Administration Office, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, P. R. China)
出处 《中华医学科研管理杂志》 2016年第6期435-438,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
基金 北京大学科研管理重点课题
关键词 临床研究者 伦理委员会 伦理审查 KAP Clinical researchers Ethics Committee Ethical review KAP
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献38

  • 1邱仁宗.医院的社会责任:伦理学视角[J].医学与哲学(A),2006,27(6):1-5. 被引量:51
  • 2伍蓉.美国西部伦理委员会(WIRB)培训体验[J].中国医学伦理学,2006,19(4):20-22. 被引量:11
  • 3Gunnar Danielsson,刘海涛(翻译).瑞典伦理委员会的管理介绍[J].中国医学伦理学,2007,20(1):30-31. 被引量:4
  • 4Adelaar T.Click and mortar strategies viewed from the web: a content analysis of features illustrating integration between retailers online and offline presence [J].Electronic Markets, 2006,15(3):1-30.
  • 5Sones M, Grantham S, Vieira ET. Communicating CSR via pharmaceutical company web sites:Evaluating message frameworks for external and internal stakeholders [J]. Corporate Communications; An International Journal,2009, 14(2):144-157.
  • 6David SW. Bureaucracy of ethics applications. BMJ, 2004,329(7460): 282-285.
  • 7FERCAP.Formation of Fercap[EB/OL].http://www.fercap-sidcer.org/whatsfercap.php.2012-02-10.
  • 8AAHRPP.Founding Members[EB/OL].http://www.aahrpp.org/learn/about-aahrpp/founding-members,2013-05-02.
  • 9FERCAP.Evaluating Standards for Recognition[EB/OL].http://www.fercap-sidcer.org/recog.php.2012-02-10.
  • 10AAHRPP.AAHRPP Accreditation Standards[EB/OL].http://www.aahrpp.org/apply/process-overview/standards.2009-10-01.

共引文献40

同被引文献58

引证文献7

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部