摘要
目的探讨无菌技术在病房应用的可行性。方法抽取5个外科病区，4个内科病区，1个ICU病区为研究对象，将每个病区的病房分为2组以两种消毒方式对比研究，从2015年7月-一2015年11月每周一次进行监测。一种方式是在清洁后关门并固定人数，另一种方式是未做任何处理开门并有人员流动，由感控护士用移动式消毒机消毒。一组消毒0．5h，一组消毒3h，两组均分别在0．5h，1h，2h，3h时间段采样监测。结果消毒0．5h组的开门组和关门组，其0．5h组与1h组和2h组比较，差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05），与3h组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）；持续消毒3h后开门组与关门组中的0．5h组与1h、2h、3h相比较，差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论通过实验证明经过0．5h的消毒后的2h内和持续消毒3h在病房实施无菌技术操作是可行的，对控制医院感染是有效的。
Objective Discussion on the feasibility of the application of aseptic technique in the ward. Methods 5 Department of surgery, 4 Department of internal medicine and 1 ICU wards were taken as the research objects. The wards of each unit were divided in to 2 groups and comparative study on two kinds of disinfection methods. The nurses used the mobile disinfection disinfection machine to monitor once a week from July 2015-2015 November. One way is to dose the door after cleaning and to fix the number of people, the other way is to open the door and have personnel flow without doing any processing. One group was disinfected 0.5h and the other one was disinfected 3h. The two groups are sampling monitoring respectively 0.5h, 1H, 2h, 3h time period. Results There was no signifi cant difference （P〉0.05） comparison of 0.5h group and lh group and 2h group of the open door group and the closed group in the sterilized 0.5h group. There was significant difference （P〈0.05） comparison of 0.5h group and 3h group. There was no significant difference （P〉0.05） comparison of 0.5h group and lh group and 2h group and 3h group of the open door group and the closed group in the continuous disinfection for 3h group. Conclusion The experiment proved that it is feasible to carry out aseptic technique in the ward after 0.5h disinfection in the duration of 2h and continuous disinfection for 3h. It is effective to control hospital infection.
出处
《检验医学》
CAS
2016年第B09期58-59,共2页
Laboratory Medicine
关键词
消毒
无菌技术
病房
可行性
医院感染
Disinfection
Aseptic technique
Ward
Feasibility
Nosocomial infection
