摘要
《刑法修正案(九)》增设的帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪是帮助犯正犯化的体现。"网络帮助犯正犯化"的做法有诸多不合理之处:网络帮助犯的社会危害性过高的前提有失偏颇;不能达到加重网络帮助犯的刑罚之目的;以刑事追诉障碍为由给网络帮助犯设立独立罪名与刑法定罪的逻辑相悖。传统的共犯理论可以解决网络帮助犯的刑事责任问题,《刑法》对网络共同犯罪不能反应过激,否则会浪费立法资源。
Some provisions of Amendment （ IX ） to the Criminal Law treat cyber aids as principals. Nevertheless, there are several unreasonable points in the provisions, for example, the premise that cyber aid＇s social harmfulness is extremely serious is biased; the goal of aggravating the punishment cannot be realized; the practice of setting independent criminal for cyber aids on the ground the prosecution obstacles contradicts the logic of criminal conviction. The traditional theory of accomplice can solve the problem of cyber aid＇s criminal liability. The criminal cannot overreact to the network accomplice. Otherwise, the legislation resources will be wasted.
出处
《山西高等学校社会科学学报》
2016年第11期58-63,共6页
Social Sciences Journal of Universities in Shanxi
关键词
帮助犯正犯化
帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪
共同犯罪
《刑法修正案(九)》
treat cyber aids as principals
crime of aiding information network criminal activities
joint offence
A- mendment （ IX ） to the Criminal Law
