期刊文献+

Comparison of ICare and IOPen vs Goldmann applanation tonometry according to international standards 8612 in glaucoma patients 被引量:1

Comparison of ICare and IOPen vs Goldmann applanation tonometry according to international standards 8612 in glaucoma patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 AIM: To compare IOPen and ICare rebound tonometry to Goldmann applanation tonometry(GAT) according to International Standards Organization(ISO) 8612 criteria.METHODS: Totally 191 eyes(n =107 individuals) were included. Criteria of ISO 8612 were fulfilled: 3 clusters of IOP, measured by GAT, were formed. The GAT results were given as mean±standard deviation.RESULTS: GAT(19.7±0.5 mm Hg) showed a significant correlation to ICare(19.8±0.5 mm Hg)(r =0.547, P 〈0.001)and IOPen(19.5 ±0.5 mm Hg)(r =0.526, P 〈0.001).According to ISO 8612 criteria in all 3 IOP groups the number of outliers(of the 95% limits of agreement)exceeded 5% for ICare and IOPen vs GAT: No.1(n =68)29.4% and 22.1%, No.2(n =62) 35.5% and 37.1%, No.3(n =61) 26.2% and 42.6%, respectively.CONCLUSION: The strict requirements of the ISO 8612 are not fulfilled in a glaucoma collective by ICare and IOPen at present. As long as the Goldmann tonometry is applicable it should be used first of all for reproducible IOP readings. ICare and IOPen tonometry should be considered as an alternative tool, if application of Goldmann tonometry is not possible. AIM: To compare IOPen and ICare rebound tonometry to Goldmann applanation tonometry(GAT) according to International Standards Organization(ISO) 8612 criteria.METHODS: Totally 191 eyes(n =107 individuals) were included. Criteria of ISO 8612 were fulfilled: 3 clusters of IOP, measured by GAT, were formed. The GAT results were given as mean±standard deviation.RESULTS: GAT(19.7±0.5 mm Hg) showed a significant correlation to ICare(19.8±0.5 mm Hg)(r =0.547, P 〈0.001)and IOPen(19.5 ±0.5 mm Hg)(r =0.526, P 〈0.001).According to ISO 8612 criteria in all 3 IOP groups the number of outliers(of the 95% limits of agreement)exceeded 5% for ICare and IOPen vs GAT: No.1(n =68)29.4% and 22.1%, No.2(n =62) 35.5% and 37.1%, No.3(n =61) 26.2% and 42.6%, respectively.CONCLUSION: The strict requirements of the ISO 8612 are not fulfilled in a glaucoma collective by ICare and IOPen at present. As long as the Goldmann tonometry is applicable it should be used first of all for reproducible IOP readings. ICare and IOPen tonometry should be considered as an alternative tool, if application of Goldmann tonometry is not possible.
出处 《International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition)》 SCIE CAS 2016年第11期1624-1628,共5页 国际眼科杂志(英文版)
关键词 ICare tonometry IOPen tonometry Goldmann applanation tonometry GLAUCOMA INTRAOCULARPRESSURE ICare tonometry IOPen tonometry Goldmann applanation tonometry glaucoma intraocularpressure
  • 相关文献

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部