摘要
目的对比分析子宫动脉灌注栓塞联合清宫术与手术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的效果。方法选取我院2010年5月-2016年5月收治34例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者并随机分为对照组（手术治疗）及观察组（子宫动脉灌注栓塞联合清宫术治疗）各17例,比较两组疗效。结果两组临床疗效比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论子宫动脉灌注栓塞联合清宫术与手术治疗各有利弊,临床应合理选用以提高临床疗效。
Objective To compare the uterine artery chemoembolizationcombined with curettage and surgical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy effect. Methods 34 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy patients were randomly divided into control group（surgery） and observation group（uterine artery chemoembolization combined with curettage treatment） in our hospital from May 2010 to May 2016, 17 cases in each group, the curative effect between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Uterine artery embolization combined with curettage and surgical treatment have advantages and disadvantages, clinical should be selected reasonably to improve the clinical curative effect.
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2016年第30期110-112,共3页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
子宫动脉灌注栓塞
清宫术
剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
Uterine artery embolization
Uterine curettage
Cesarean scar pregnancy
