摘要
目的探讨结肠癌采用腹腔镜手术和传统手术的效果差异。方法 100例结肠癌患者随机分成对照组和观察组,各50例。观察组使用腹腔镜根治术治疗,对照组使用传统根治术治疗,对两组手术及恢复情况进行对比分析。结果观察组的术中出血量(102.3±12.1)ml、下床时间(3.6±0.3)d、住院时间(8.7±1.3)d、排气时间(1.6±0.2)d、恢复工作时间(13.4±1.5)d均少于对照组的(204.3±26.2)ml、(4.3±0.5)d、(11.4±1.6)d、(3.4±0.5)d、(18.5±2.4)d,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论结肠癌使用腹腔镜手术治疗的临床效果优于传统手术,患者出血量少,恢复快,值得临床推广使用。
Objective To investigate difference of effects between laparoscopic surgery and traditional surgery for colon cancer. Methods A total of 100 patients with colon cancer were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 50 cases in each group. The observation group received laparoscopic radical surgery, and the control group received traditional radical surgery for treatment. Comparison and analysis was made on operation and recovery condition between the two groups. Results The observation group had intraoperative bleeding volume as（102.3±12.1） ml, off-bed time as（3.6±0.3） d, hospital stay time as（8.7±1.3） d, exhaust time as（1.6±0.2） d, and resume work time as（13.4±1.5） d, which were all lower than（204.3±26.2） ml,（4.3±0.5） d,（11.4±1.6） d,（3.4±0.5） d, and（18.5±2.4） d of the control group. Their differences all had statistical significance（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Implement of laparoscopic surgery in treating colon cancer shows better clinical effect than traditional surgery, along with few bleeding volume and quick rehabilitation. This method is worth clinical promotion and application.
出处
《中国现代药物应用》
2016年第21期17-18,共2页
Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
关键词
结肠癌
腹腔镜根治术
传统根治术
临床疗效
Colon cancer
Laparoscopic radical surgery
Traditional radical surgery
Clinical effect
