4Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC, et al. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol, 2002, 90: 29-34.
5Bellenger NG, Burgess M1, Ray SG, et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur heart J, 2000, 21:1387-1396.
6Hofman HA, Knaapen P, Boellaard R, et al. Measurement of left ventricular volumes and function with O-15-1abeled carbon monoxide gated positron emission tomography: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Nucl Cardiol, 2005, 12: 639-644.
7Gutierrez-Chico JL, Zamorano JL, Perez De Isla L, et al. Comparison of left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions measured by three-dimensional echocardiography versus by two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with various cardiomyopathies. Am J Cardiol, 2005, 95: 809-813.
8Jenkins C, Bricknell K, Hanekom L, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of left ventficular parameters using real-time three-dimensional echoeardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 44:878-886.
9Qin JX, Jones M, Shiota T, et al. The accuracy of left ventricular mass determined by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in chronic animal and clinical studies: a comparison with postmortem examination and magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2005, 18 : 1037-1043.
10Maim S, Frigstad S, Sagberg E, et ai. Real-time simultaneous triplane contrast echocardiography gives rapid, accurate, and reproducible assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction : a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2006, 19:1494-1501.
