小型开放经济中环境税改革的效应研究被引量：3

Effects of environmental tax reforms in a small open economy

下载PDF

导出

摘要文章在一般均衡模型框架下考察了事先存在税收"扭曲"的"次优环境"中,环境税改革对小型开放经济的效应,并利用重庆市的宏观经济数据对模型结论进行模拟。结果发现:环境税有利于改善环境质量,但同时也加重了原本的经济扭曲,环境与经济效率之间存在替代关系,从而表明"双重红利"假说不成立;"次优环境"下的最优环境税低于"最优环境"下的最优环境税率(庇古税率);对重庆市宏观经济数据的模拟却表明环境税对家庭和企业的影响具有显著的差异性。 By virtue of general equilibrium model, the paper evaluates the effect on environment tax on small open economy in the ＂ sub-optimum environment＂ where ＂ distortion＂ pre-exists, and utilizes the macro economic data of Chongqing Municipality to perform simulation on the model conclusions. As demonstrated by the model analysis results, environmental taxes are favorable to improve environment quality, and meanwhile the original economic distortion is aggravated. Actually, a kind of substitution relation exists between environment and economic efficiency, therefore, it demonstrates that the ＂ double dividend ＂ hyphothesis fails, and the optimum environmental tax under sub-optimum environment is lower than Pigou tax rate. The simulation of the macro economic data of Chongqing municipality demonstrates that environment tax has distinctive influence differences on families and enterprises.

作者周志波张卫国刘晔

机构地区西南大学经济管理学院重庆市地方税务局办公室厦门大学经济学院

出处《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期53-64,共12页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基金国家社会科学基金重大项目"中国新型城镇化包容性发展的路径设计与战略选择"(12&ZD100)) 国家社会科学基金项目"不同市场结构下我国环境税效应研究"(13BJY149) 重庆市社会科学规划(培育)项目"环境税‘双重红利’效应研究"(2013PYYJ16) 中央高校基本科研业务专项资金项目"中国环境税改革路径研究-基于OECD国家经验"(SWU1409126) "环境税防控农业面源污染机制研究"(SWU1509307)

关键词税制改革环境税双重红利庇古税率小型开放经济 tax system reform effects of environmental taxes double dividend Pigovian tax rate small open economy

分类号 F810.42 [经济管理—财政学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1刘建徽,周志波.环境税研究的效应发凡及其选择性引申[J].改革,2012(3):111-116. 被引量：4

二级参考文献15

1王德发.能源税征收的劳动替代效应实证研究——基于上海市2002年大气污染的CGE模型的试算[J].财经研究,2006,32(2):98-105. 被引量：40
2Goulder,L.H.,Environmental taxation and thedouble dividend:A reader’s guide,International Taxand Public Finance 1995(2),pp.155-182.
3Carraro,C.M.Galeotti and M.Gallo,Environmentaltaxation and unemployment:Some evidence on the’double dividend hypothesis’,Journal of PublicEconomics,1996(62),pp.141-181.
4Goodstein,E.,The Death of the Pigovian Tax?PolicyImplications from the Double-Dividend Debate,LandEconomics,2003-79(3),pp.402-414.
5Bovenberg,A.L.,and R.A.Mooij,Environmental taxreform and endogenous growth,Journal of PublicEconomics,1997(63),pp.207-237.
6Chen,J.H.,et al.Growth,welfare and transitionaldynamics in an endogenously growing economy withabatement labor,Journal of Macroeconomics,2009(31),pp.423-437.
7IPCC,Climate Change 1995.Economic and SocialDimensions of Climate Change,Contribution of Work-ing Group III to the 2nd Assessment Report of theIPCC.WMO and UNEP.Cambridge University Press,1996,New York,NY.
8Porterba,J.B.J.J.Rotemberg,“EnvironmentalTaxes on Intermediate and Final Goods When Both CanBe Imported”,International Tax and Public Finance,1995(2),pp.221-228.
9Clinch,J.P.,L.Dunne and S.Dresner,“Environ-mental and wider implications of political impedimentsto environmental tax reform”,Energy Policy,2006(34),pp.960-970.
10Metcalf,G.E.,A distributional analysis of greentax reforms,National Tax Journal,1999(52-4),pp.655-681.