期刊文献+

彩色多普勒超声检查在乳腺癌化疗疗效评价中的应用 被引量:10

Application of color Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of breast cancer chemotherapy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:分析超声对于乳腺癌术前新辅助化疗的临床疗效评价价值。方法:选取我科2013年1月至2015年1月行新辅助化疗后手术治疗的乳腺癌患者共65例,采用彩色多普勒超声对化疗疗效进行评价。结果:化疗后乳腺癌原有病灶较前清晰、形态不规则、周边声带部分消失、内部回声增多、后方回声倾向无变化(P<0.05)。PR组化疗后肿块体积、PSV、RI、肿块弹性评分显著低于SD+PD组(P<0.05)。PR组化疗后腋窝淋巴结最大径、纵横比、PSV、RI显著低于SD+PD组(P<0.05)。以病理学对于乳腺癌化疗疗效评价作为金标准,超声疗效评价的灵敏度为87.50%,特异度为57.57%。结论:新辅助化疗后采用超声评价乳腺癌化疗疗效具有一定的临床价值。 ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical value of ultrasound for breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods : Total of 65 cases patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgical treatment in our department from January 2013 to January 2015 were selected and examined with color Doppler ultrasound to evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy. Results : Compared with the condition before chemotherapy, the original lesion of breast cancer after chemotherapy became clear, irregular, with peripheral vocal part disappeared, internal echoes in-creased ,posterior echo tendency unchanged (P 〈 0. 05 ) . The tumor volume, PSV, RI, mass elasticity score in PR group after chemotherapy were significantly lower than SD + PD group (P 〈0. 05). The maximum diameter, aspect ratio,PSV, RI of axillary lymph nodes after chemotherapy in PR group was significantly lower than SD + PD group (P 〈0. 05). With pathological efficacy of chemotherapy for breast cancer as the gold standard,the sensitivity of ultrasound efficacy evaluation was 87. 50% , and specificity was 57. 57% . Conclusion: After neoadjuvant chemotherapy the effi-cacy of chemotherapy using ultrasound evaluation in breast cancer has some clinical value.
作者 英华 陈颖
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2016年第21期3401-3404,共4页 Journal of Modern Oncology
基金 莱芜市星火计划项目(编号:2011XH11010)
关键词 超声 乳腺癌 新辅助化疗 ultrasound,breast cancer,neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献71

  • 1欧冰,罗葆明,冯霞,杨海云,文艳玲,智慧,马健鸿.超声弹性成像与钼靶X线成像诊断乳腺疾病的对照研究[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2006,3(4):240-241. 被引量:8
  • 2中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2011版)[J].中国癌症杂志,2011,21(5):367-417. 被引量:281
  • 3罗葆明,欧冰,冯霞,周敏,文艳玲.乳腺疾病实时组织弹性成像与病理对照的初步探讨[J].中国超声医学杂志,2005,21(9):662-664. 被引量:209
  • 4罗葆明,欧冰,冯霞,文艳玲,智慧.乳腺疾病实时组织弹性成像与彩色多普勒超声的对照研究[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2005,2(5):265-267. 被引量:31
  • 5罗葆明,欧冰,智慧,曾婕,杨海云.改良超声弹性成像评分标准在乳腺肿块鉴别诊断中的价值[J].现代临床医学生物工程学杂志,2006,12(5):396-398. 被引量:382
  • 6Lyman GH, Giuliano AE,Somerfield MR,et al. AmericanSociety ofclinical oncology guideline recommendations for sentinellymph nodebiopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol,2005,23:7703-7720.
  • 7Naik AM,Fey J,Gemignani M,et al. The risk of axillary relapseafter sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparablewith that of axillary lymph node dissection : a follow-up study of4008 procedures. Ann Surg, 2004,240 : 462-468.
  • 8David N, Krag MD, Stewart J,et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resectioncompared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection inclinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overallsurvival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3trial. Lancet Oncol,2010,11 : 927-933.
  • 9Caudle AS, Hunt KK, Mittendorf EA. Response to the Letter tothe Editor : Multidisciplinary Considerations in the Implementationof the Findings from the American College of Surgeons OncologyGroup (ACOSOG) Z0011 Study : A Practice-Changing Trial. AnnSurg Oncol,2011,12:283.
  • 10Olson JA Jr, McCall LM, Beitsch P, et al. American college ofsurgeons oncology group trials Z0010 and Z0011 ; Impact ofimmediate versus delayed axillary node dissection on surgicaloutcomes in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel nodes:results from American College of Surgeons Oncology Group TrialsZ0010 and Z0011. J Clin Oncol, 2008,12:3530-3535.

共引文献98

同被引文献79

引证文献10

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部