摘要
新史学是20世纪中国史学的重要组成部分,但它首先是国际学术流变的产物,尤与日、美、苏等国关联密切。中国新史学发端于清末,此后在国际学术互动、本国学术发展和国内社会政治变革等多重因素的交互影响下,先后经历了初始形态、学院派形态、社会化形态及政治化形态四个阶段;每个阶段各具特点,其基本阵营和思想资源也各有差异。新史学的发展对中国史学乃至学术体制产生了深刻影响。上世纪中国新史学在多数时候有深刻的政治背景,也有着明显的现实关怀和政治指向,并始终服务于现实政治。在晚近中国,新史学蕴含着中国学人对学术独立和民族独立的强烈诉求及民族主体性意识。这是中国新史学嬗变进程中始终不变的主题,并与同期中国的发展轨迹和社会思潮高度吻合。在此过程中,中国学人为捍卫、阐扬民族主体性进行了卓富成效的努力。
In a sense,Chinas New History closely allied to the international academic trends,especially those in Japan,the U. S. A. and the former Soviet Union. Consequently,it always insisted on tagging along the world learning and Chinas political culture. During the early and middle parts of the 20 th century,Chinas New History underwent three stages and generated four forms successively,namely,initial form,academic( academism)form,popular( socialized) form and political( ideologized) from. All of them manifested strong reality concern,and most of them intimately contacted with special relative political and economic influences. Comparatively,New Historiography is relatively independent from special party forces,so it was neutral and detached to party political disputes. Luckily,as the elite of the New Historiography,Chinas historians played a pivotal role in the development of the New Historiography and institutionalized New History in college system,and what is more,they sanicized scientific history and advanced it to a world-class level. On the whole,all the kinds of New Historiography were of significance in modern Chinese learning,cultural and intellectual circles. They coincided with the historical process and served Chinas independence in culture and politics. In this course,Chinas intelligentsia has displayed extraordinary courage,earnest endeavor,wisdom and originality.
出处
《清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期14-34,共21页
Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
