期刊文献+

多Agent交互策略模型检测方法 被引量:3

The Method of Model Checking Policy of Multi-Agent Interaction
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 提出一种基于模型检测的多Agent交互策略验证方法,首先通过责任政策语言建模多Agent的交互策略,基于责任政策语言的操作语义将政策模型转换为模型检测器Nu SMV的输入,利用时态逻辑声明表征策略冲突的系统性质,然后利用模型检测器Nu SMV自动验证政策模型对性质的可满足性,并根据模型检测器产生的反例分析交互策略中的各种错误。该方法可提高交互策略的验证效率,确保多Agent系统设计的正确性。 A verification method of multi-agent interaction policy is proposed based on model checking. The model of system is specified with obligation policy language and it is converted to the input model of model checker NuSMV based on its operational semantics, the properties of system depending on different types of policy conflicts are represented with temporal logic, and the violations of properties are detected by using NuSMV model checker, which can provide the counterexample and trace it back to the errors in interaction policy. The result shows that the method can improve the efficiency of verifying interaction policy, and it ensures the correctness of the design of Multi-agent systems.
出处 《电子科技大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期802-807,共6页 Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
基金 国家科技支撑计划(2012BAH08B02) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金(HEUCF100603,HEUCF041204) 黑龙江省博士后资助项目(3236310148)
关键词 形式化方法 模型检测 多AGENT系统 NUSMV 政策建模 formal method model checking multi-agent system NuSMV policy model
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1LOIZOS M, DAVID P C, PFEFFER A. Specifying and monitoring economic environments using rights and obligations[J]. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2010, 20(2): 158-197.
  • 2XU Dian-xiang, SANFORD M, LIU Zhao-liang. Testing access control and obligation policies[C]//Intemational Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications. San Diego, CA , USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2013: 540-544.
  • 3BALDONI M, BAROGLIO C. Constitutive and regulative specifications of commitment protocols: a decoupled approach[J]. Acm Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2013, 4(2): 1-25.
  • 4董孟高,毛新军,常志明,王戟,齐治昌.自适应多Agent系统的运行机制和策略描述语言SADL[J].软件学报,2011,22(4):609-624. 被引量:7
  • 5MINSKY N H, ROZENSHTEIN D. A law-based approach to object-oriented programming[C]//Proceedings on Object- Oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applications. New York, NY, USA: Applied Intelligence, 1987: 482-493.
  • 6M1NSKY N H, UNGUREANU V. Law-governed interaction: a coordination and control mechanism for heterogeneous distributed systems[J]. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering Methodology, 2000, 9(3): 273-305.
  • 7FORNARA N, COLOMBETTI M. Specifying and enforcing norms in artificial institutions: a retrospective review[C]// Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies. Taipei, Taiwan, China: Springer, 2012: 117-119.
  • 8EI-MENSHAWY M, BENTAHAR J. Reducing model checking commitments for agent communication to model checking ARCTL and GCTL[J]. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2013, 27(3): 375-418.
  • 9YOLUM A P. Constraint satisfaction as a tool for modeling and checking feasibility of multiagent commitments[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2013, 39(3): 489-509.
  • 10DOUGHERTY D J, FISLER K, KRISHNAMURTHI S. Obligations and their interaction with programs[C]// Proceedings of 12th European Symposium on Research in Computer Security. Dresden, Germany: Springer, 2007: 375-389.

二级参考文献4

共引文献7

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部