摘要
依据物权法第一百零七条,遗失物不适用善意取得,究其原因在于遗失物脱离权利人占有,非基于权利人意愿。而其他动产则适用善意取得,原因在于动产脱离占有,是基于权利人的意志,或出于借用,或出于租赁等目的,动产占有由所有权人转移至借用人或者租赁人等,虽然所有权人不存在可归责性,但动产脱离占有至第三人,仍与所有权人存在关联关系。虽然遗失物权利人可以行使返还请求权,但受两年期限的限制,若未在两年内请求返还,则不得再请求返还。但第三人不能依据现有的制度取得所有权,这可能会造成"双重所有权"现象,若是通过时效取得制度,可以一定程度解决该现象。
According to the ＂property law＂, the loss of property does not be applied to bona fide acquisition, the reason is that the loss of property separate from the right holder, which did not base on the wishes of the property people. And other movable property is applied to the bona fide acquisition, because of the movable property out of possession, is based on the will of the right person, Or for use, or for the purpose of leasing, the possession of the movable property transferred from the ownership to the borrower or the lessee etc. although ownership may be no imputation, but real estate ,which out of possession to the third person, it still has exist relationship with ownership. Although the property people can exercise the right that claim return the movable property, but the right is subject to the limit of two years, if the property people dose not exercise the right in two years, the property may not be returned. But third people can not base on the existing system to obtain ownership, which may cause double ownership phenomenon, if the system can accept the rule of achieved through time,which can solve the phenomenon.
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2016年第4期117-122,共6页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
遗失物
善意取得
最大效用
取得时效
loss
bona fide acquisition
maximum utility
and time limitation
