摘要
立案登记制实行以来,已将更多行政争议纳入司法程序之中,但也引发了人们对行政"滥诉"的忧虑。对行政"滥诉"乱象进行治理之前,应先确定标准去认定何为"滥诉",否则很可能会混淆"滥诉"与非"滥诉"案件,将某些正当诉求阻挡在法院大门之外。认定当事人构成行政"滥诉",应当看其是否具备主观故意、扰乱司法秩序等要件。行政"滥诉"表现出虚假诉讼、恶意诉讼、无理缠诉等典型特征,当事人向人民法院提起诉讼频繁、对行政机关的工作产生了干扰等则不属于这一行为。法院对一起行政案件是否构成"滥诉"发挥着关键作用,当前阶段法院应以审慎的理念对待行政"滥诉"。
Since the implementation of the registration system, more administrative disputes have been included in the judicial process, but also led to the people of the administrative ＂abuse＂ of concern. Prior to treatment of the Administrative Lawsuit Abuse ＂chaos, should first to determine the standards to identify what is the abuse of litigation＂, otherwise it may confuse the abuse of litigation, and non the abuse of litigation cases, the some of the legitimate demands of blocking outside the door of the court. Finds that the parties constitute administrative abuse of litigation, it should be to see whether it has a subjective intent, to disrupt the judicial order and other elements. Administrative Lawsuit Abuse ＂exhibit v. typical characteristics of winding of the false litigation, malicious litigation, unreasonable, the parties to the people＇s court filed frequent lawsuits, interference of administrative organs do not belong to this behavior. The court is a key role in the ＇ abuse of litigation＇, the current stage of the court should be prudent to treat the concept of administrative abuse＂.
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2016年第4期81-85,共5页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
立案登记制
行政诉讼
滥诉
认定标准
治理
registration system
administrative litigation
abuse of litigation
standards
governance
