摘要
海德格尔认为,对于"什么是哲学"这一问题,有非哲学化和哲学化两种回答方式。透过他的相关论述,我们可以合乎逻辑地推出"中国哲学"合法性证明的两种基本途径:非哲学化的证明和哲学化的证明。其非哲学化的证明是,在"哲学"概念或定义分析的基础上,对中国传统文化中是否具有可以用"哲学"名之的思想的判断;其哲学化的证明是,"中国传统文化中的某些思想是否能与(西方)哲学家(的思想)进入某种对话状态"。前者主要是一种理论的澄清和辩护,后者主要是一种实践的诠释与构建。(传统)中国哲学,只有在继承与发扬的当代哲学实践中才能真正给予自己无可置疑的合法性证明。
Heidegger believed that there are two ways to answer the question, ＂what is the philosophy？＂-- the philosophizing way and the non- philosophizing way. Through these related discussions of Heidegger, we can draws two paths to prove the legal status of ＂Chinese philosophy＂--the philosophizing proving and the non- philosophizing proving. The former is one kind of theoretical defense; the latter is one kind of practical explanation and construction. The traditional Chinese philosophy can give itself the indubitable legal status only when it is inherited and promoted in the contemporary philosophical practice.
出处
《云梦学刊》
2016年第5期52-56,共5页
Journal of Yunmeng
基金
教育部人文社会科学规划基金课题"德性文明的发端与分野:先秦和古希腊道德哲学比较研究"(11YJA720034)
关键词
哲学
中国哲学
合法性证明
海德格尔
philosophy
Chinese philosophy
legal status
Heidegger
