摘要
目的探讨观察筋膜蒂皮瓣与腹部带蒂皮瓣修复手指皮肤软组织缺损的临床疗效。方法2012年12月～2015年6月，于我院收治的手指皮肤软组织缺损患者中选取82例作为观察对象，并根据其修复术的不同而分为两组，其中观察组41例采用筋膜蒂皮瓣修复，而对照组41例采用腹部带蒂皮瓣修复，比较其临床疗效。结果治疗后6个月，观察组临床疗效总优良率（90．24％）明显高于对照组（73．17％），差异比较有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论筋膜蒂皮瓣修复手指皮肤软组织缺损的临床疗效优于腹部带蒂皮瓣修复，值得临床推广。
Objective To explore the clinical curative effect of fascial pedicle skin flap and abdominal pedicle skin flap in the repairing of skin and soft tissue defect of finger. Methods 82 cases of patients with soft tissue defect of finger skin cured in our hospital from December 2012 to Jane 2015 were selected as the objects. According to the different repair operation, they were divided into two groups with dl cases in each. Patients in observation group were repaired by fascial pedicle skin flap, and patients in control group were repaired by abdominal pedicle skin flap. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results 6 months after the treatment, total excellent rate of clinical effect of observation group （90.24%） was significantly higher than that of control group （73.17%）, and the difference was statistically significant （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion The clinical curative effect of fascial pedicle skin flap in the repairing of skin and soft tissue defect of finger is better than the effect of abdominal pedicle skin flap. It is worthy of clinical promotion.
出处
《中国医药科学》
2016年第15期197-200,共4页
China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词
筋膜蒂皮瓣
腹部带蒂皮瓣
修复
手指
皮肤软组织缺损
Fascial pedicle skin flap
Abdominal pedicle skin flap
Repair
Finger
Skin and soft tissue defect
